sem2mutex: drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c

Semaphore to mutex conversion.

The conversion was generated via scripts, and the result was validated
automatically via a script as well.

Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
index abbdb37a7f5f..7c6f97e9c727 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_ACPI_CPUFREQ_PROC_INTF
 #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #endif
@@ -48,7 +49,7 @@
 #define _COMPONENT              ACPI_PROCESSOR_COMPONENT
 ACPI_MODULE_NAME("acpi_processor")
 
-static DECLARE_MUTEX(performance_sem);
+static DEFINE_MUTEX(performance_mutex);
 
 /*
  * _PPC support is implemented as a CPUfreq policy notifier:
@@ -72,7 +73,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
         struct acpi_processor *pr;
         unsigned int ppc = 0;
 
-        down(&performance_sem);
+        mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
 
         if (event != CPUFREQ_INCOMPATIBLE)
                 goto out;
@@ -93,7 +94,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_ppc_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
                                      core_frequency * 1000);
 
       out:
-        up(&performance_sem);
+        mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
 
         return 0;
 }
@@ -564,16 +565,16 @@ acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
         if (!(acpi_processor_ppc_status & PPC_REGISTERED))
                 return_VALUE(-EINVAL);
 
-        down(&performance_sem);
+        mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
 
         pr = processors[cpu];
         if (!pr) {
-                up(&performance_sem);
+                mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
                 return_VALUE(-ENODEV);
         }
 
         if (pr->performance) {
-                up(&performance_sem);
+                mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
                 return_VALUE(-EBUSY);
         }
 
@@ -581,13 +582,13 @@ acpi_processor_register_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
 
         if (acpi_processor_get_performance_info(pr)) {
                 pr->performance = NULL;
-                up(&performance_sem);
+                mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
                 return_VALUE(-EIO);
         }
 
         acpi_cpufreq_add_file(pr);
 
-        up(&performance_sem);
+        mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
         return_VALUE(0);
 }
 
@@ -601,11 +602,11 @@ acpi_processor_unregister_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
 
         ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE("acpi_processor_unregister_performance");
 
-        down(&performance_sem);
+        mutex_lock(&performance_mutex);
 
         pr = processors[cpu];
         if (!pr) {
-                up(&performance_sem);
+                mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
                 return_VOID;
         }
 
@@ -614,7 +615,7 @@ acpi_processor_unregister_performance(struct acpi_processor_performance
 
         acpi_cpufreq_remove_file(pr);
 
-        up(&performance_sem);
+        mutex_unlock(&performance_mutex);
 
         return_VOID;
 }