[media] bttv: remove unneeded locking comments

After Mauro's "bttv: Fix locking issues due to BKL removal code" there
are a number of comments that are no longer needed about lock ordering.
Remove them.

Signed-off-by: Brandon Philips <bphilips@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c b/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
index c14b819d6b78..e071b62f36aa 100644
--- a/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
+++ b/drivers/media/video/bt8xx/bttv-driver.c
@@ -2359,13 +2359,6 @@ static int setup_window_lock(struct bttv_fh *fh, struct bttv *btv,
         fh->ov.field    = win->field;
         fh->ov.setup_ok = 1;
 
-        /*
-         * FIXME: btv is protected by btv->lock mutex, while btv->init
-         *        is protected by fh->cap.vb_lock. This seems to open the
-         *        possibility for some race situations. Maybe the better would
-         *        be to unify those locks or to use another way to store the
-         *        init values that will be consumed by videobuf callbacks
-         */
         btv->init.ov.w.width   = win->w.width;
         btv->init.ov.w.height  = win->w.height;
         btv->init.ov.field     = win->field;
@@ -3220,15 +3213,6 @@ static int bttv_open(struct file *file)
                 return -ENOMEM;
         file->private_data = fh;
 
-        /*
-         * btv is protected by btv->lock mutex, while btv->init and other
-         * streaming vars are protected by fh->cap.vb_lock. We need to take
-         * care of both locks to avoid troubles. However, vb_lock is used also
-         * inside videobuf, without calling buf->lock. So, it is a very bad
-         * idea to hold both locks at the same time.
-         * Let's first copy btv->init at fh, holding cap.vb_lock, and then work
-         * with the rest of init, holding btv->lock.
-         */
         *fh = btv->init;
 
         fh->type = type;
@@ -3303,10 +3287,6 @@ static int bttv_release(struct file *file)
 
         /* free stuff */
 
-        /*
-         * videobuf uses cap.vb_lock - we should avoid holding btv->lock,
-         * otherwise we may have dead lock conditions
-         */
         videobuf_mmap_free(&fh->cap);
         videobuf_mmap_free(&fh->vbi);
         v4l2_prio_close(&btv->prio, fh->prio);