aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/usb
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>2012-07-02 14:04:01 -0400
committerJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>2012-07-09 16:42:22 -0400
commit5c7b0531299dad4255ff5c5106d060150cda75a4 (patch)
tree68a9a807e1a07b30cafca5a6793c5aa80ae743d1 /drivers/usb
parentc66433dc5dda15861dcbac63a97645771d14feb6 (diff)
NFC: Add initial Sony RC-S360 support to pn533
Sony RC-S360 is also known as the Sony PaSoRi contactless reader. Only type 2, 3 and 4 tag reading is supported at the moment. Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/usb')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions
05-09-10 13:06:31 -0400 [PATCH] Spelling and whitespace fixes for REPORTING-BUGS' href='/cgit/cgit.cgi/litmus-rt.git/commit/REPORTING-BUGS?h=v2.6.21-rc5&id=9dcbb32f1654e79c212c20d9cd9d48509ee1eaf7'>9dcbb32f1654
1da177e4c3f4
9dcbb32f1654
1da177e4c3f4

4e229beff7ee


30e835e36648

1da177e4c3f4
30e835e36648
1da177e4c3f4
30e835e36648







1da177e4c3f4





1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65










                                                                         
                                                                        





                                                                        


                                                                         
                                                    




                                                                          


                                                                            







                                                                           
                                                              
 
                                     

                                                  


                                           

                                                                       
                                                  
                                                               
                          







                                                                          





                                                                 
[Some of this is taken from Frohwalt Egerer's original linux-kernel FAQ]

     What follows is a suggested procedure for reporting Linux bugs. You
aren't obliged to use the bug reporting format, it is provided as a guide
to the kind of information that can be useful to developers - no more.

     If the failure includes an "OOPS:" type message in your log or on
screen please read "Documentation/oops-tracing.txt" before posting your
bug report. This explains what you should do with the "Oops" information
to make it useful to the recipient.

      Send the output to the maintainer of the kernel area that seems to
be involved with the problem, and cc the relevant mailing list. Don't
worry too much about getting the wrong person. If you are unsure send it
to the person responsible for the code relevant to what you were doing.
If it occurs repeatably try and describe how to recreate it. That is
worth even more than the oops itself.  The list of maintainers and
mailing lists is in the MAINTAINERS file in this directory.

      If it is a security bug, please copy the Security Contact listed
in the MAINTAINERS file.  They can help coordinate bugfix and disclosure.
See Documentation/SecurityBugs for more information.

      If you are totally stumped as to whom to send the report, send it to
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org. (For more information on the linux-kernel
mailing list see http://www.tux.org/lkml/).

This is a suggested format for a bug report sent to the Linux kernel mailing
list. Having a standardized bug report form makes it easier for you not to
overlook things, and easier for the developers to find the pieces of
information they're really interested in. Don't feel you have to follow it.

      First run the ver_linux script included as scripts/ver_linux, which
reports the version of some important subsystems.  Run this script with
the command "sh scripts/ver_linux".

Use that information to fill in all fields of the bug report form, and
post it to the mailing list with a subject of "PROBLEM: <one line
summary from [1.]>" for easy identification by the developers.

[1.] One line summary of the problem:
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
[3.] Keywords (i.e., modules, networking, kernel):
[4.] Kernel information
[4.1.] Kernel version (from /proc/version):
[4.2.] Kernel .config file:
[5.] Most recent kernel version which did not have the bug:
[6.] Output of Oops.. message (if applicable) with symbolic information
     resolved (see Documentation/oops-tracing.txt)
[7.] A small shell script or example program which triggers the
     problem (if possible)
[8.] Environment
[8.1.] Software (add the output of the ver_linux script here)
[8.2.] Processor information (from /proc/cpuinfo):
[8.3.] Module information (from /proc/modules):
[8.4.] Loaded driver and hardware information (/proc/ioports, /proc/iomem)
[8.5.] PCI information ('lspci -vvv' as root)
[8.6.] SCSI information (from /proc/scsi/scsi)
[8.7.] Other information that might be relevant to the problem
       (please look in /proc and include all information that you
       think to be relevant):
[X.] Other notes, patches, fixes, workarounds:


Thank you