Fix misspellings of "agressive".

Fix the various misspellings of "agressive", as well as a couple
other things on the same lines while we're there.

Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h
index 7b39f4a35e98..7b08d6caaa99 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw1.h
@@ -1020,7 +1020,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
          *  It shall be a tagged command.
          *  Read SIMPLE+TAG.
          *  The C code will deal with errors.
-         *  Agressive optimization, is'nt it? :)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :)
          */
         SCR_MOVE_ABS (2) ^ SCR_MSG_IN,
                 HADDR_1 (msgin),
@@ -1044,7 +1044,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
                 RADDR_1 (dsa),
         /*
          *  The SIDL still contains the TAG value.
-         *  Agressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
          */
         SCR_REG_SFBR (sidl, SCR_SHL, 0),
                 0,
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h
index 851f2706f220..6e5b952312e3 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_fw2.h
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
          *  It shall be a tagged command.
          *  Read SIMPLE+TAG.
          *  The C code will deal with errors.
-         *  Agressive optimization, is'nt it? :)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :)
          */
         SCR_MOVE_ABS (2) ^ SCR_MSG_IN,
                 HADDR_1 (msgin),
@@ -968,7 +968,7 @@ static struct SYM_FWA_SCR SYM_FWA_SCR = {
                 offsetof(struct sym_lcb, head.itlq_tbl_sa),
         /*
          *  The SIDL still contains the TAG value.
-         *  Agressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
+         *  Aggressive optimization, isn't it? :):)
          */
         SCR_REG_SFBR (sidl, SCR_SHL, 0),
                 0,