[S390]: Fix use of skb after netif_rx

Recently, Wang Chen submitted a patch
(d30f53aeb31d453a5230f526bea592af07944564) to move a call to netif_rx(skb)
after a subsequent reference to skb, because netif_rx may call kfree_skb on
its argument.  netif_rx_ni calls netif_rx, so the same problem occurs in
the files below.

I have left the updating of dev->last_rx after the calls to netif_rx_ni
because it seems time dependent, but moved the other field updates before.

This was found using the following semantic match.
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)

// <smpl>
@@
expression skb, e,e1;
@@

(
 netif_rx(skb);
|
 netif_rx_ni(skb);
)
  ... when != skb = e
(
  skb = e1
|
* skb
)
// </smpl>

Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c b/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c
index 4d18d6419ddc..c7ea9381db9f 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/netiucv.c
@@ -639,14 +639,14 @@ static void netiucv_unpack_skb(struct iucv_connection *conn,
                 skb->dev = pskb->dev;
                 skb->protocol = pskb->protocol;
                 pskb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
+                privptr->stats.rx_packets++;
+                privptr->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
                 /*
                  * Since receiving is always initiated from a tasklet (in iucv.c),
                  * we must use netif_rx_ni() instead of netif_rx()
                  */
                 netif_rx_ni(skb);
                 dev->last_rx = jiffies;
-                privptr->stats.rx_packets++;
-                privptr->stats.rx_bytes += skb->len;
                 skb_pull(pskb, header->next);
                 skb_put(pskb, NETIUCV_HDRLEN);
         }