[PATCH] RTCs don't use i2c_adapter.dev

Update more I2C drivers that live outside drivers/i2c to understand that using
adapter->dev is not The Way.  When actually referring to the adapter hardware,
adapter->class_dev.dev is the answer.  When referring to a device connected to
it, client->dev.dev is the answer.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
index a760cf69af90..4b72b8ef5d66 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf8563.c
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ static int pcf8563_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
                 xfer = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msgs, ARRAY_SIZE(msgs));
 
                 if (xfer != ARRAY_SIZE(msgs)) {
-                        dev_err(&client->adapter->dev,
+                        dev_err(&client->dev,
                                 "%s: could not read register 0x%02X\n",
                                 __FUNCTION__, pattern[i].reg);
 
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static int pcf8563_validate_client(struct i2c_client *client)
 
                 if (value > pattern[i].max ||
                         value < pattern[i].min) {
-                        dev_dbg(&client->adapter->dev,
+                        dev_dbg(&client->dev,
                                 "%s: pattern=%d, reg=%x, mask=0x%02x, min=%d, "
                                 "max=%d, value=%d, raw=0x%02X\n",
                                 __FUNCTION__, i, pattern[i].reg, pattern[i].mask,
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int pcf8563_probe(struct i2c_adapter *adapter, int address, int kind)
 
         int err = 0;
 
-        dev_dbg(&adapter->dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
+        dev_dbg(adapter->class_dev.dev, "%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
 
         if (!i2c_check_functionality(adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C)) {
                 err = -ENODEV;