regulator: max8997: Properly handle gpio_request failure

Convert to devm_gpio_request to save a few error handling code.

This patch properly handle the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY, we should
return error rather than ommit the gpio_request failure with -EBUSY.

I think one of the reason we got -EBUSY is because current code does not free
gpios in max8997_pmic_remove(). So it got -EBUSY when reload the module.

Yest another reason is in current code if gpio_request() returns -EBUSY,
the rest of the code still calls gpio_direction_output to config buck125_gpios
and set gpio value in max8997_set_gpio().  This looks wrong to me.

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 31 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
index 704cd49ef375..e39a0c7260dc 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/max8997.c
@@ -1025,7 +1025,6 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
          */
         if (pdata->buck1_gpiodvs || pdata->buck2_gpiodvs ||
                         pdata->buck5_gpiodvs) {
-                bool gpio1set = false, gpio2set = false;
 
                 if (!gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]) ||
                                 !gpio_is_valid(pdata->buck125_gpios[1]) ||
@@ -1035,40 +1034,20 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                         goto err_out;
                 }
 
-                ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[0],
-                                "MAX8997 SET1");
-                if (ret == -EBUSY)
-                        dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
-                                        " on SET1\n");
-                else if (ret)
+                ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[0],
+                                        "MAX8997 SET1");
+                if (ret)
                         goto err_out;
-                else
-                        gpio1set = true;
-
-                ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[1],
-                                "MAX8997 SET2");
-                if (ret == -EBUSY)
-                        dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
-                                        " on SET2\n");
-                else if (ret) {
-                        if (gpio1set)
-                                gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]);
+
+                ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[1],
+                                        "MAX8997 SET2");
+                if (ret)
                         goto err_out;
-                } else
-                        gpio2set = true;
 
-                ret = gpio_request(pdata->buck125_gpios[2],
+                ret = devm_gpio_request(&pdev->dev, pdata->buck125_gpios[2],
                                 "MAX8997 SET3");
-                if (ret == -EBUSY)
-                        dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Duplicated gpio request"
-                                        " on SET3\n");
-                else if (ret) {
-                        if (gpio1set)
-                                gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[0]);
-                        if (gpio2set)
-                                gpio_free(pdata->buck125_gpios[1]);
+                if (ret)
                         goto err_out;
-                }
 
                 gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck125_gpios[0],
                                 (max8997->buck125_gpioindex >> 2)
@@ -1079,7 +1058,6 @@ static __devinit int max8997_pmic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
                 gpio_direction_output(pdata->buck125_gpios[2],
                                 (max8997->buck125_gpioindex >> 0)
                                 & 0x1); /* SET3 */
-                ret = 0;
         }
 
         /* DVS-GPIO disabled */