eeepc-laptop: Properly annote eeepc_enable_camera().

Currently the annotation for function eeepc_enable_camera() is
__init, and refers to a
function eeepc_hotk_add() which is non-init. Use __devinit for both
functions which is
more appropriate and fixes a section mismatch warning.

 We were warned by the following warning:

  LD      drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o
WARNING: drivers/platform/x86/built-in.o(.text+0x12e1): Section
mismatch in reference from the function eeepc_hotk_add() to the
function .init.text:eeepc_enable_camera()
The function eeepc_hotk_add() references
the function __init eeepc_enable_camera().
This is often because eeepc_hotk_add lacks a __init
annotation or the annotation of eeepc_enable_camera is wrong.

Signed-off-by: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
index 749e2102b2be..789d6ae003fb 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/eeepc-laptop.c
@@ -350,7 +350,7 @@ static const struct rfkill_ops eeepc_rfkill_ops = {
         .set_block = eeepc_rfkill_set,
 };
 
-static void __init eeepc_enable_camera(void)
+static void __devinit eeepc_enable_camera(void)
 {
         /*
          * If the following call to set_acpi() fails, it's because there's no
@@ -1189,7 +1189,7 @@ static int eeepc_input_init(struct device *dev)
         return 0;
 }
 
-static int eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
+static int __devinit eeepc_hotk_add(struct acpi_device *device)
 {
         struct device *dev;
         int result;