pinctrl: remove superfluous optimization in pinctrl_select_state_locked

As Stephen Warren suggested, checking first if the setting->node entry
is the first in the list or not is superfluous, as it is checked again
in the list_for_each_entry bellow.
So, remove it, the code will be simpler and lighter !

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index 986d0e02761c..f04f7d3d9a94 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -967,20 +967,12 @@ static int pinctrl_select_state_locked(struct pinctrl *p,
 unapply_new_state:
         dev_err(p->dev, "Error applying setting, reverse things back\n");
 
-        /*
-         * If the loop stopped on the 1st entry, nothing has been enabled,
-         * so jump directly to the 2nd phase
-         */
-        if (list_entry(&setting->node, typeof(*setting), node) ==
-            list_first_entry(&state->settings, typeof(*setting), node))
-                goto reapply_old_state;
-
         list_for_each_entry(setting2, &state->settings, node) {
                 if (&setting2->node == &setting->node)
                         break;
                 pinctrl_free_setting(true, setting2);
         }
-reapply_old_state:
+
         if (old_state) {
                 list_for_each_entry(setting, &old_state->settings, node) {
                         bool found = false;