UBI: improve comment

Explain better the purpose of thie 'move_to_put' stuff.

Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
index a405d40faa23..36aa097203f9 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/ubi/wl.c
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ static int wear_leveling_worker(struct ubi_device *ubi, struct ubi_work *wrk,
                 e1 = rb_entry(rb_first(&ubi->scrub), struct ubi_wl_entry, rb);
                 e2 = find_wl_entry(&ubi->free, WL_FREE_MAX_DIFF);
                 paranoid_check_in_wl_tree(e1, &ubi->scrub);
-        rb_erase(&e1->rb, &ubi->scrub);
+                rb_erase(&e1->rb, &ubi->scrub);
                 dbg_wl("scrub PEB %d to PEB %d", e1->pnum, e2->pnum);
         }
 
@@ -1139,8 +1139,11 @@ int ubi_wl_put_peb(struct ubi_device *ubi, int pnum, int torture)
                 /*
                  * User is putting the physical eraseblock which was selected
                  * as the target the data is moved to. It may happen if the EBA
-                 * unit already re-mapped the LEB but the WL unit did has not
-                 * put the PEB to the "used" tree.
+                 * unit already re-mapped the LEB in 'ubi_eba_copy_leb()' but
+                 * the WL unit has not put the PEB to the "used" tree yet, but
+                 * it is about to do this. So we just set a flag which will
+                 * tell the WL worker that the PEB is not needed anymore and
+                 * should be sheduled for erasure.
                  */
                 dbg_wl("PEB %d is the target of data moving", pnum);
                 ubi_assert(!ubi->move_to_put);