sgi-xp: eliminate '>>>' in comments

Comments in /drivers/misc/sgi-xp has been using '>>>' as a means to draw
attention to something that needs to be done or considered.  To avoid
colliding with git rejects, '>>>' will now be replaced by '!!!' to
indicate something to do, and by '???' to indicate something to be
considered.

Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c
index 63fe59a5bfac..e42c3038203c 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/sgi-xp/xpc_sn2.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ xpc_allow_IPI_ops_sn2(void)
         int node;
         int nasid;
 
-        /* >>> The following should get moved into SAL. */
+        /* !!! The following should get moved into SAL. */
         if (is_shub2()) {
                 xpc_sh2_IPI_access0_sn2 =
                     (u64)HUB_L((u64 *)LOCAL_MMR_ADDR(SH2_IPI_ACCESS0));
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ xpc_disallow_IPI_ops_sn2(void)
         int node;
         int nasid;
 
-        /* >>> The following should get moved into SAL. */
+        /* !!! The following should get moved into SAL. */
         if (is_shub2()) {
                 for_each_online_node(node) {
                         nasid = cnodeid_to_nasid(node);
@@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ xpc_teardown_infrastructure_sn2(struct xpc_partition *part)
  * dst must be a cacheline aligned virtual address on this partition.
  * cnt must be cacheline sized
  */
-/* >>> Replace this function by call to xp_remote_memcpy() or bte_copy()? */
+/* ??? Replace this function by call to xp_remote_memcpy() or bte_copy()? */
 static enum xp_retval
 xpc_pull_remote_cachelines_sn2(struct xpc_partition *part, void *dst,
                                const void *src, size_t cnt)
@@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@ xpc_send_msg_sn2(struct xpc_channel *ch, u32 flags, void *payload,
                 notify->key = key;
                 notify->type = notify_type;
 
-                /* >>> is a mb() needed here? */
+                /* ??? Is a mb() needed here? */
 
                 if (ch->flags & XPC_C_DISCONNECTING) {
                         /*