88pm860x_battery and charger: Fix a few post-merge issues

Sparse complains:

  CHECK   drivers/power/88pm860x_battery.c
drivers/power/88pm860x_battery.c:128:5: warning: symbol 'array_soc' was not declared. Should it be static?
  CHECK   drivers/power/88pm860x_charger.c
drivers/power/88pm860x_charger.c:640:3: warning: symbol 'pm860x_irq_descs' was not declared. Should it be static?
  CHECK   drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c:803:53: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c:803:53:    expected struct charger_regulator *charger_regulators
drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c:803:53:    got struct regulator_bulk_data static [toplevel] *

The issues are minor, except for the last one. We seemed to use
'regulator_bulk_data' struct (just as charger manager documentation
wrongly tells us), but in real it should have been
'struct charger_regulator'. The only reason that it worked is
because both 'supply' and 'regulator_name' struct members are the
first in these structs. :-)

Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@linaro.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
index 229cb2920089..76b5b7daf65d 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm860x-core.c
@@ -157,8 +157,8 @@ static struct regulator_init_data preg_init_data = {
         .consumer_supplies      = &preg_supply[0],
 };
 
-static struct regulator_bulk_data chg_desc_regulator_data[] = {
-        { .supply = "preg", },
+static struct charger_regulator chg_desc_regulator_data[] = {
+        { .regulator_name = "preg", },
 };
 
 static struct mfd_cell power_devs[] = {