md/raid5: add a missing 'continue' in a loop.

As the comment says, the tail of this loop only applies to devices
that are not fully in sync, so if In_sync was set, we should avoid
the rest of the loop.

This bug will hardly ever cause an actual problem.  The worst it
can do is allow an array to be assembled that is dirty and degraded,
which is not generally a good idea (without warning the sysadmin
first).

This will only happen if the array is RAID4 or a RAID5/6 in an
intermediate state during a reshape and so has one drive that is
all 'parity' - no data - while some other device has failed.

This is certainly possible, but not at all common.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 09f07dadf404..66cd47973398 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -5057,8 +5057,10 @@ static int run(mddev_t *mddev)
         list_for_each_entry(rdev, &mddev->disks, same_set) {
                 if (rdev->raid_disk < 0)
                         continue;
-                if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags))
+                if (test_bit(In_sync, &rdev->flags)) {
                         working_disks++;
+                        continue;
+                }
                 /* This disc is not fully in-sync.  However if it
                  * just stored parity (beyond the recovery_offset),
                  * when we don't need to be concerned about the