generalize lgread_u32/lgwrite_u32.

Jes complains that page table code still uses lgread_u32 even though
it now uses general kernel pte types.  The best thing to do is to
generalize lgread_u32 and lgwrite_u32.

This means we lose the efficiency of getuser().  We could potentially
regain it if we used __copy_from_user instead of copy_from_user, but
I'm not certain that our range check is equivalent to access_ok() on
all platforms.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>

1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
index 3a53788ba450..9d5184c7c14a 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lguest *lg, struct hcall_args *args)
                 char msg[128];
                 /* If the lgread fails, it will call kill_guest() itself; the
                  * kill_guest() with the message will be ignored. */
-                lgread(lg, msg, args->arg1, sizeof(msg));
+                __lgread(lg, msg, args->arg1, sizeof(msg));
                 msg[sizeof(msg)-1] = '\0';
                 kill_guest(lg, "CRASH: %s", msg);
                 break;