lguest: make pending notifications per-vcpu

this patch makes the pending_notify field, used to control
pending notifications, per-vcpu, instead of per-guest

Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
index ab70bbebdf25..be8f04685767 100644
--- a/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
+++ b/drivers/lguest/hypercalls.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void do_hcall(struct lg_cpu *cpu, struct hcall_args *args)
                 cpu->halted = 1;
                 break;
         case LHCALL_NOTIFY:
-                lg->pending_notify = args->arg1;
+                cpu->pending_notify = args->arg1;
                 break;
         default:
                 /* It should be an architecture-specific hypercall. */
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static void do_async_hcalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
 
                 /* Stop doing hypercalls if they want to notify the Launcher:
                  * it needs to service this first. */
-                if (lg->pending_notify)
+                if (cpu->pending_notify)
                         break;
         }
 }
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ void do_hypercalls(struct lg_cpu *cpu)
         /* If we stopped reading the hypercall ring because the Guest did a
          * NOTIFY to the Launcher, we want to return now.  Otherwise we do
          * the hypercall. */
-        if (!cpu->lg->pending_notify) {
+        if (!cpu->pending_notify) {
                 do_hcall(cpu, cpu->hcall);
                 /* Tricky point: we reset the hcall pointer to mark the
                  * hypercall as "done".  We use the hcall pointer rather than