hwmon: Fault files naming convention

We have the following naming convention documented in
Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface for fault files:

in[0-*]_input_fault
fan[1-*]_input_fault
temp[1-*]_input_fault

Some drivers follow this convention (lm63, lm83, lm90, smsc47m192).
However some drivers omit the "input" part and create files named
fan1_fault (pc87427) or temp1_fault (dme1737). And the new "generic"
libsensors follows this second (non-standard) convention, so it fails
to report fault conditions for drivers which follow the standard.

We want a single naming scheme, and everyone seems to prefer the
shorter variant, so let's go for it.

Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
index 5771130f51ff..48833fff4920 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_crit_hyst, S_IRUGO, show_temphyst, NULL, 4);
 /* Individual alarm files */
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_crit_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 0);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_crit_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 1);
-static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_input_fault, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 2);
+static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_fault, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 2);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_min_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 3);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp2_max_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 4);
 static SENSOR_DEVICE_ATTR(temp1_min_alarm, S_IRUGO, show_alarm, NULL, 5);
@@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ static struct attribute *lm90_attributes[] = {
 
         &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_crit_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
         &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_crit_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
-        &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_input_fault.dev_attr.attr,
+        &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_fault.dev_attr.attr,
         &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_min_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
         &sensor_dev_attr_temp2_max_alarm.dev_attr.attr,
         &sensor_dev_attr_temp1_min_alarm.dev_attr.attr,