Merge branch 'for-next' into for-linus

Conflicts:
	Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
	arch/arm/mach-u300/include/mach/debug-macro.S
	drivers/net/qlge/qlge_ethtool.c
	drivers/net/qlge/qlge_main.c
	drivers/net/typhoon.c

4 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
index 71247da17da5..75bceee76044 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bios.c
@@ -3545,7 +3545,7 @@ int nouveau_bios_parse_lvds_table(struct drm_device *dev, int pxclk, bool *dl, b
          * at which modes should be set up in the dual link style.
          *
          * Following the header, the BMP (ver 0xa) table has several records,
-         * indexed by a seperate xlat table, indexed in turn by the fp strap in
+         * indexed by a separate xlat table, indexed in turn by the fp strap in
          * EXTDEV_BOOT. Each record had a config byte, followed by 6 script
          * numbers for use by INIT_SUB which controlled panel init and power,
          * and finally a dword of ms to sleep between power off and on
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
index 5f8d987af363..4b9aaf2a8d0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drv.h
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ struct drm_nouveau_private {
         uint32_t ramro_offset;
         uint32_t ramro_size;
 
-        /* base physical adresses */
+        /* base physical addresses */
         uint64_t fb_phys;
         uint64_t fb_available_size;
         uint64_t fb_mappable_pages;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c
index 3c32f840dcd2..40ab6d9c3736 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_state.c
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@ static void radeon_cp_dispatch_clear(struct drm_device * dev,
                                         /* judging by the first tile offset needed, could possibly
                                            directly address/clear 4x4 tiles instead of 8x2 * 4x4
                                            macro tiles, though would still need clear mask for
-                                           right/bottom if truely 4x4 granularity is desired ? */
+                                           right/bottom if truly 4x4 granularity is desired ? */
                                         OUT_RING(tileoffset * 16);
                                         /* the number of tiles to clear */
                                         OUT_RING(nrtilesx + 1);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
index 5935b8842e86..34079f251cd4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/via/via_irq.c
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ irqreturn_t via_driver_irq_handler(DRM_IRQ_ARGS)
                 cur_irq++;
         }
 
-        /* Acknowlege interrupts */
+        /* Acknowledge interrupts */
         VIA_WRITE(VIA_REG_INTERRUPT, status);
 
 
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static __inline__ void viadrv_acknowledge_irqs(drm_via_private_t * dev_priv)
         u32 status;
 
         if (dev_priv) {
-                /* Acknowlege interrupts */
+                /* Acknowledge interrupts */
                 status = VIA_READ(VIA_REG_INTERRUPT);
                 VIA_WRITE(VIA_REG_INTERRUPT, status |
                           dev_priv->irq_pending_mask);