drm/nv20: Don't use pushbuf calls on the original nv20.

The "return" command is buggy on the original nv20, it jumps back to
the caller address as expected, but it doesn't clear the subroutine
active bit making the subsequent pushbuf calls fail with a "stack"
overflow.

Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
index a915dcdd9a49..613f878e6d0f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                                       push[i].length);
                 }
         } else
-        if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+        if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
                 ret = RING_SPACE(chan, req->nr_push * 2);
                 if (ret) {
                         NV_ERROR(dev, "cal_space: %d\n", ret);
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ out_next:
                 req->suffix0 = 0x00000000;
                 req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
         } else
-        if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+        if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
                 req->suffix0 = 0x00020000;
                 req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
         } else {