drm/i915: more struct_mutex locking

When auditing the locking in i915_gem.c (for a prospective change which
I then abandoned), I noticed two places where struct_mutex is not held
across GEM object manipulations that would usually require it.

Since one is in initial setup and the other in driver unload, I'm
guessing the mutex is not required for either; but post a patch in case
it is.

Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
index a670c006982e..56a8e2aea19c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_overlay.c
@@ -1416,6 +1416,8 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
                 goto out_free;
         overlay->reg_bo = reg_bo;
 
+        mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
         if (OVERLAY_NEEDS_PHYSICAL(dev)) {
                 ret = i915_gem_attach_phys_object(dev, reg_bo,
                                                   I915_GEM_PHYS_OVERLAY_REGS,
@@ -1440,6 +1442,8 @@ void intel_setup_overlay(struct drm_device *dev)
                 }
         }
 
+        mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
+
         /* init all values */
         overlay->color_key = 0x0101fe;
         overlay->brightness = -19;
@@ -1464,6 +1468,7 @@ out_unpin_bo:
         i915_gem_object_unpin(reg_bo);
 out_free_bo:
         drm_gem_object_unreference(&reg_bo->base);
+        mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
 out_free:
         kfree(overlay);
         return;