drm/i915: remove do_retire from i915_wait_request

This originates from a hack by me to quickly fix a bug in an earlier
patch where we needed control over whether or not waiting on a seqno
actually did any retire list processing. Since the two operations aren't
clearly related, we should pull the parameter out of the wait function,
and make the caller responsible for retiring if the action is desired.

The only function call site which did not get an explicit retire_request call
(on purpose) is i915_gem_inactive_shrink(). That code was already calling
retire_request a second time.

v2: don't modify any behavior excepit i915_gem_inactive_shrink(Daniel)

Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 0095c8d12569..2113a1ab9625 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -1297,14 +1297,13 @@ int __must_check i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_device *dev);
 void i915_gem_init_swizzling(struct drm_device *dev);
 void i915_gem_init_ppgtt(struct drm_device *dev);
 void i915_gem_cleanup_ringbuffer(struct drm_device *dev);
-int __must_check i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev, bool do_retire);
+int __must_check i915_gpu_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
 int __must_check i915_gem_idle(struct drm_device *dev);
 int __must_check i915_add_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
                                   struct drm_file *file,
                                   struct drm_i915_gem_request *request);
 int __must_check i915_wait_request(struct intel_ring_buffer *ring,
-                                   uint32_t seqno,
-                                   bool do_retire);
+                                   uint32_t seqno);
 int i915_gem_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_fault *vmf);
 int __must_check
 i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,