aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>2012-02-18 13:54:45 -0500
committerStefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>2012-02-22 16:36:01 -0500
commit90963f1cdb3baffc68321e7c98073bf9e99d2ec7 (patch)
treef05b75602a799b48d38f751de20b879d87bd6c4a /drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
parent280f64d4f108b7ac707d6208d50a59627b984dc5 (diff)
firewire: core: fix race at address_handler unregistration
Fix the following unlikely but possible race: CPU 1 CPU 2 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ AR-request tasklet lookup handler unregister handler free handler->callback_data or handler call handler->callback The application which registered the handler has no way to stop nodes sending new requests to their address range, hence cannot prevent this race. Fix it simply by extending the address_handler_lock-protected region from only around the lookup to around both lookup and call. We only need to do so in the exclusive region handler; the FCP region handler already holds the lock around the handler->callback call. Alas this removes the current ability to execute the callback in parallel on different CPUs if it was called for different FireWire cards at the same time. (For a single card, the handler is already serialized.) If this loss of a rather obscure feature is not tolerable, a more complex fix would be required: Add a handler reference counter; wait in fw_core_remove_address_handler() for this conter to become zero. Signed-off-by: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c13
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c b/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
index 89e310ba03ba..190bf61533a2 100644
--- a/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
+++ b/drivers/firewire/core-transaction.c
@@ -602,6 +602,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(fw_core_add_address_handler);
602 602
603/** 603/**
604 * fw_core_remove_address_handler() - unregister an address handler 604 * fw_core_remove_address_handler() - unregister an address handler
605 *
606 * When fw_core_remove_address_handler() returns, @handler->callback() is
607 * guaranteed to not run on any CPU anymore.
605 */ 608 */
606void fw_core_remove_address_handler(struct fw_address_handler *handler) 609void fw_core_remove_address_handler(struct fw_address_handler *handler)
607{ 610{
@@ -838,16 +841,16 @@ static void handle_exclusive_region_request(struct fw_card *card,
838 spin_lock_irqsave(&address_handler_lock, flags); 841 spin_lock_irqsave(&address_handler_lock, flags);
839 handler = lookup_enclosing_address_handler(&address_handler_list, 842 handler = lookup_enclosing_address_handler(&address_handler_list,
840 offset, request->length); 843 offset, request->length);
841 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&address_handler_lock, flags); 844 if (handler)
842
843 if (handler == NULL)
844 fw_send_response(card, request, RCODE_ADDRESS_ERROR);
845 else
846 handler->address_callback(card, request, 845 handler->address_callback(card, request,
847 tcode, destination, source, 846 tcode, destination, source,
848 p->generation, offset, 847 p->generation, offset,
849 request->data, request->length, 848 request->data, request->length,
850 handler->callback_data); 849 handler->callback_data);
850 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&address_handler_lock, flags);
851
852 if (!handler)
853 fw_send_response(card, request, RCODE_ADDRESS_ERROR);
851} 854}
852 855
853static void handle_fcp_region_request(struct fw_card *card, 856static void handle_fcp_region_request(struct fw_card *card,