DMAEngine: sirf: lock the shared registers access in sirfsoc_dma_terminate_all

Just like Russell pointed out in "DMAEngine: sirf: add DMA
pause/resume support" at
http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg212496.html
here I find sirfsoc_dma_terminate_all() has same problem,
so move the locking to the front of registers access.

Signed-off-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c b/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
index 7d78cf7bb7f1..fb5790d8a0b0 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/sirf-dma.c
@@ -291,6 +291,8 @@ static int sirfsoc_dma_terminate_all(struct sirfsoc_dma_chan *schan)
         int cid = schan->chan.chan_id;
         unsigned long flags;
 
+        spin_lock_irqsave(&schan->lock, flags);
+
         if (!sdma->is_marco) {
                 writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_INT_EN) &
                         ~(1 << cid), sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_INT_EN);
@@ -305,9 +307,9 @@ static int sirfsoc_dma_terminate_all(struct sirfsoc_dma_chan *schan)
 
         writel_relaxed(1 << cid, sdma->base + SIRFSOC_DMA_CH_VALID);
 
-        spin_lock_irqsave(&schan->lock, flags);
         list_splice_tail_init(&schan->active, &schan->free);
         list_splice_tail_init(&schan->queued, &schan->free);
+
         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&schan->lock, flags);
 
         return 0;