WorkStruct: Pass the work_struct pointer instead of context data

Pass the work_struct pointer to the work function rather than context data.
The work function can use container_of() to work out the data.

For the cases where the container of the work_struct may go away the moment the
pending bit is cleared, it is made possible to defer the release of the
structure by deferring the clearing of the pending bit.

To make this work, an extra flag is introduced into the management side of the
work_struct.  This governs auto-release of the structure upon execution.

Ordinarily, the work queue executor would release the work_struct for further
scheduling or deallocation by clearing the pending bit prior to jumping to the
work function.  This means that, unless the driver makes some guarantee itself
that the work_struct won't go away, the work function may not access anything
else in the work_struct or its container lest they be deallocated..  This is a
problem if the auxiliary data is taken away (as done by the last patch).

However, if the pending bit is *not* cleared before jumping to the work
function, then the work function *may* access the work_struct and its container
with no problems.  But then the work function must itself release the
work_struct by calling work_release().

In most cases, automatic release is fine, so this is the default.  Special
initiators exist for the non-auto-release case (ending in _NAR).


Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index dd0c2623e27b..7a7c6e6dfe4f 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpufreq_driver_lock);
 
 /* internal prototypes */
 static int __cpufreq_governor(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int event);
-static void handle_update(void *data);
+static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work);
 
 /**
  * Two notifier lists: the "policy" list is involved in the
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev (struct sys_device * sys_dev)
         mutex_init(&policy->lock);
         mutex_lock(&policy->lock);
         init_completion(&policy->kobj_unregister);
-        INIT_WORK(&policy->update, handle_update, (void *)(long)cpu);
+        INIT_WORK(&policy->update, handle_update);
 
         /* call driver. From then on the cpufreq must be able
          * to accept all calls to ->verify and ->setpolicy for this CPU
@@ -895,9 +895,11 @@ static int cpufreq_remove_dev (struct sys_device * sys_dev)
 }
 
 
-static void handle_update(void *data)
+static void handle_update(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-        unsigned int cpu = (unsigned int)(long)data;
+        struct cpufreq_policy *policy =
+                container_of(work, struct cpufreq_policy, update);
+        unsigned int cpu = policy->cpu;
         dprintk("handle_update for cpu %u called\n", cpu);
         cpufreq_update_policy(cpu);
 }