libata: rename ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* to ATAPI_PROT_*

ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are ugly and naming schemes between ATA_PROT_* and
ATA_PROT_ATAPI_* are inconsistent causing confusion.  Rename them to
ATAPI_PROT_* and make them consistent with ATA counterpart.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 14 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c b/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c
index 9638faaa8111..01738d736d44 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_promise.c
@@ -456,13 +456,13 @@ static void pdc_atapi_pkt(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
          * and seq id (byte 2)
          */
         switch (qc->tf.protocol) {
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_DMA:
                 if (!(qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_WRITE))
                         buf32[0] = cpu_to_le32(PDC_PKT_READ);
                 else
                         buf32[0] = 0;
                 break;
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_NODATA:
                 buf32[0] = cpu_to_le32(PDC_PKT_NODATA);
                 break;
         default:
@@ -489,7 +489,7 @@ static void pdc_atapi_pkt(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
         buf[19] = qc->tf.lbal;
 
         /* set feature and byte counter registers */
-        if (qc->tf.protocol != ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA)
+        if (qc->tf.protocol != ATAPI_PROT_DMA)
                 feature = PDC_FEATURE_ATAPI_PIO;
         else
                 feature = PDC_FEATURE_ATAPI_DMA;
@@ -619,14 +619,14 @@ static void pdc_qc_prep(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
                 pdc_pkt_footer(&qc->tf, pp->pkt, i);
                 break;
 
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_PIO:
                 pdc_fill_sg(qc);
                 break;
 
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_DMA:
                 pdc_fill_sg(qc);
                 /*FALLTHROUGH*/
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_NODATA:
                 pdc_atapi_pkt(qc);
                 break;
 
@@ -746,8 +746,8 @@ static inline unsigned int pdc_host_intr(struct ata_port *ap,
         switch (qc->tf.protocol) {
         case ATA_PROT_DMA:
         case ATA_PROT_NODATA:
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_DMA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_NODATA:
                 qc->err_mask |= ac_err_mask(ata_wait_idle(ap));
                 ata_qc_complete(qc);
                 handled = 1;
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ static inline void pdc_packet_start(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 static unsigned int pdc_qc_issue_prot(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 {
         switch (qc->tf.protocol) {
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_NODATA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_NODATA:
                 if (qc->dev->flags & ATA_DFLAG_CDB_INTR)
                         break;
                 /*FALLTHROUGH*/
@@ -900,7 +900,7 @@ static unsigned int pdc_qc_issue_prot(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
                 if (qc->tf.flags & ATA_TFLAG_POLLING)
                         break;
                 /*FALLTHROUGH*/
-        case ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA:
+        case ATAPI_PROT_DMA:
         case ATA_PROT_DMA:
                 pdc_packet_start(qc);
                 return 0;
@@ -914,16 +914,14 @@ static unsigned int pdc_qc_issue_prot(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
 
 static void pdc_tf_load_mmio(struct ata_port *ap, const struct ata_taskfile *tf)
 {
-        WARN_ON(tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_DMA ||
-                tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA);
+        WARN_ON(tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_DMA || tf->protocol == ATAPI_PROT_DMA);
         ata_tf_load(ap, tf);
 }
 
 static void pdc_exec_command_mmio(struct ata_port *ap,
                                   const struct ata_taskfile *tf)
 {
-        WARN_ON(tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_DMA ||
-                tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_ATAPI_DMA);
+        WARN_ON(tf->protocol == ATA_PROT_DMA || tf->protocol == ATAPI_PROT_DMA);
         ata_exec_command(ap, tf);
 }