aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>2007-11-26 06:58:02 -0500
committerJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>2007-11-26 11:03:40 -0500
commite190222d04cb1119c62876ac87cf9b9403ba3bd5 (patch)
treee7aabe0c306f4f5b169c06d0829258717953cc5a /drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
parentdc86f6d4183c79a08fa01c08dd2191895c0c7eb0 (diff)
libata: bump transfer chunk size if it's odd
None of the drives I have follows what the standard says about transfer chunk size. Of the four SATA and six PATA ATAPI devices tested, four ignore transfer chunk size completely and the ones which honor it don't behave according to the spec when it's odd. According to the spec, transfer chunk size can be odd if the amount of data to transfer equals or is smaller than the chunk size and the device can indicate the same odd number and transfer the whole thing at one go with a pad byte appended. However, in reality, none of the drives I have does that. They all indicate and transfer even number of bytes one byte shorter than the chunk size first; then indicate and transfer two bytes, which is clearly out of spec. In addition to unnecessary second PIO data phase, this also creates a weird problem when combined with SATA controllers which perform PIO via DMA. Some of these controllers use actualy number of bytes received to update DMA pointer so chunks which are sized 4n + 2 makes DMA pointer off by two bytes. This causes data corruption and buffer overruns. This patch rounds nbytes up to the nearest even number such that ATAPI devices don't split data transfer for the last odd byte. This shouldn't confuse controllers which depend on transfer chunk size as devices will report the rounded-up number, actually transfer that much and padding buffer is there to receive them. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c35
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
index a45f6ac3b245..a883bb03d4c7 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
@@ -2485,11 +2485,40 @@ static unsigned int atapi_xlat(struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
2485 if (!using_pio && ata_check_atapi_dma(qc)) 2485 if (!using_pio && ata_check_atapi_dma(qc))
2486 using_pio = 1; 2486 using_pio = 1;
2487 2487
2488 /* Some controller variants snoop this value for Packet transfers 2488 /* Some controller variants snoop this value for Packet
2489 to do state machine and FIFO management. Thus we want to set it 2489 * transfers to do state machine and FIFO management. Thus we
2490 properly, and for DMA where it is effectively meaningless */ 2490 * want to set it properly, and for DMA where it is
2491 * effectively meaningless.
2492 */
2491 nbytes = min(qc->nbytes, (unsigned int)63 * 1024); 2493 nbytes = min(qc->nbytes, (unsigned int)63 * 1024);
2492 2494
2495 /* Most ATAPI devices which honor transfer chunk size don't
2496 * behave according to the spec when odd chunk size which
2497 * matches the transfer length is specified. If the number of
2498 * bytes to transfer is 2n+1. According to the spec, what
2499 * should happen is to indicate that 2n+1 is going to be
2500 * transferred and transfer 2n+2 bytes where the last byte is
2501 * padding.
2502 *
2503 * In practice, this doesn't happen. ATAPI devices first
2504 * indicate and transfer 2n bytes and then indicate and
2505 * transfer 2 bytes where the last byte is padding.
2506 *
2507 * This inconsistency confuses several controllers which
2508 * perform PIO using DMA such as Intel AHCIs and sil3124/32.
2509 * These controllers use actual number of transferred bytes to
2510 * update DMA poitner and transfer of 4n+2 bytes make those
2511 * controller push DMA pointer by 4n+4 bytes because SATA data
2512 * FISes are aligned to 4 bytes. This causes data corruption
2513 * and buffer overrun.
2514 *
2515 * Always setting nbytes to even number solves this problem
2516 * because then ATAPI devices don't have to split data at 2n
2517 * boundaries.
2518 */
2519 if (nbytes & 0x1)
2520 nbytes++;
2521
2493 qc->tf.lbam = (nbytes & 0xFF); 2522 qc->tf.lbam = (nbytes & 0xFF);
2494 qc->tf.lbah = (nbytes >> 8); 2523 qc->tf.lbah = (nbytes >> 8);
2495 2524