ACPICA: Standardize all switch() blocks

After many years, different formatting for switch() has crept in.
This change makes every switch block identical. Chao Guan.
ACPICA bugzilla 997.

References: https://bugs.acpica.org/show_bug.cgi?id=997
Signed-off-by: Chao Guan <chao.guan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c
index 7ea0f162f11c..eb56b66444b5 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/dscontrol.c
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
 
         switch (op->common.aml_opcode) {
         case AML_WHILE_OP:
-
                 /*
                  * If this is an additional iteration of a while loop, continue.
                  * There is no need to allocate a new control state.
@@ -99,7 +98,6 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
                 /*lint -fallthrough */
 
         case AML_IF_OP:
-
                 /*
                  * IF/WHILE: Create a new control state to manage these
                  * constructs. We need to manage these as a stack, in order
@@ -142,6 +140,7 @@ acpi_ds_exec_begin_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state *walk_state,
                 break;
 
         default:
+
                 break;
         }
 
@@ -344,6 +343,7 @@ acpi_ds_exec_end_control_op(struct acpi_walk_state * walk_state,
         case AML_NOOP_OP:
 
                 /* Just do nothing! */
+
                 break;
 
         case AML_BREAK_POINT_OP: