block: Simplify bsg complete all

It took me a few tries to figure out what this code did; lets rewrite
it into a more regular form.

The thing that makes this one 'special' is the BSG_F_BLOCK flag, if
that is not set we're not supposed/allowed to block and should spin
wait for completion.

The (new) io_wait_event() will never see a false condition in case of
the spinning and we will therefore not block.

Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 47 deletions

diff --git a/block/bsg.c b/block/bsg.c
index 276e869e686c..d214e929ce18 100644
--- a/block/bsg.c
+++ b/block/bsg.c
@@ -136,42 +136,6 @@ static inline struct hlist_head *bsg_dev_idx_hash(int index)
         return &bsg_device_list[index & (BSG_LIST_ARRAY_SIZE - 1)];
 }
 
-static int bsg_io_schedule(struct bsg_device *bd)
-{
-        DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
-        int ret = 0;
-
-        spin_lock_irq(&bd->lock);
-
-        BUG_ON(bd->done_cmds > bd->queued_cmds);
-
-        /*
-         * -ENOSPC or -ENODATA?  I'm going for -ENODATA, meaning "I have no
-         * work to do", even though we return -ENOSPC after this same test
-         * during bsg_write() -- there, it means our buffer can't have more
-         * bsg_commands added to it, thus has no space left.
-         */
-        if (bd->done_cmds == bd->queued_cmds) {
-                ret = -ENODATA;
-                goto unlock;
-        }
-
-        if (!test_bit(BSG_F_BLOCK, &bd->flags)) {
-                ret = -EAGAIN;
-                goto unlock;
-        }
-
-        prepare_to_wait(&bd->wq_done, &wait, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
-        spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock);
-        io_schedule();
-        finish_wait(&bd->wq_done, &wait);
-
-        return ret;
-unlock:
-        spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock);
-        return ret;
-}
-
 static int blk_fill_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request_queue *q, struct request *rq,
                                 struct sg_io_v4 *hdr, struct bsg_device *bd,
                                 fmode_t has_write_perm)
@@ -482,6 +446,30 @@ static int blk_complete_sgv4_hdr_rq(struct request *rq, struct sg_io_v4 *hdr,
         return ret;
 }
 
+static bool bsg_complete(struct bsg_device *bd)
+{
+        bool ret = false;
+        bool spin;
+
+        do {
+                spin_lock_irq(&bd->lock);
+
+                BUG_ON(bd->done_cmds > bd->queued_cmds);
+
+                /*
+                 * All commands consumed.
+                 */
+                if (bd->done_cmds == bd->queued_cmds)
+                        ret = true;
+
+                spin = !test_bit(BSG_F_BLOCK, &bd->flags);
+
+                spin_unlock_irq(&bd->lock);
+        } while (!ret && spin);
+
+        return ret;
+}
+
 static int bsg_complete_all_commands(struct bsg_device *bd)
 {
         struct bsg_command *bc;
@@ -492,17 +480,7 @@ static int bsg_complete_all_commands(struct bsg_device *bd)
         /*
          * wait for all commands to complete
          */
-        ret = 0;
-        do {
-                ret = bsg_io_schedule(bd);
-                /*
-                 * look for -ENODATA specifically -- we'll sometimes get
-                 * -ERESTARTSYS when we've taken a signal, but we can't
-                 * return until we're done freeing the queue, so ignore
-                 * it.  The signal will get handled when we're done freeing
-                 * the bsg_device.
-                 */
-        } while (ret != -ENODATA);
+        io_wait_event(bd->wq_done, bsg_complete(bd));
 
         /*
          * discard done commands