perf_counter, powerpc, sparc: Fix compilation after perf_counter_overflow() change

Commit 5622f295 ("x86, perf_counter, bts: Optimize BTS overflow
handling") removed the regs field from struct perf_sample_data and
added a regs parameter to perf_counter_overflow().  This breaks the
build on powerpc (and Sparc) as reported by Sachin Sant:

  arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c: In function 'record_and_restart':
  arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c:1165: error: unknown field 'regs' specified in initializer

This adjusts arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c to correspond with the
new struct perf_sample_data and perf_counter_overflow().

[ v2: also fix Sparc, Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com> ]

Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Markus Metzger <markus.t.metzger@intel.com>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: benh@kernel.crashing.org
Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <19127.8400.376239.586120@drongo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 7ceefaf3a7f5..5ccf9bca96c0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,6 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
          */
         if (record) {
                 struct perf_sample_data data = {
-                        .regs   = regs,
                         .addr   = 0,
                         .period = counter->hw.last_period,
                 };
@@ -1170,7 +1169,7 @@ static void record_and_restart(struct perf_counter *counter, unsigned long val,
                 if (counter->attr.sample_type & PERF_SAMPLE_ADDR)
                         perf_get_data_addr(regs, &data.addr);
 
-                if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data)) {
+                if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, nmi, &data, regs)) {
                         /*
                          * Interrupts are coming too fast - throttle them
                          * by setting the counter to 0, so it will be
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 09de4035eaa9..b1265ce8a053 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -493,7 +493,6 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
 
         regs = args->regs;
 
-        data.regs = regs;
         data.addr = 0;
 
         cpuc = &__get_cpu_var(cpu_hw_counters);
@@ -513,7 +512,7 @@ static int __kprobes perf_counter_nmi_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
                 if (!sparc_perf_counter_set_period(counter, hwc, idx))
                         continue;
 
-                if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data))
+                if (perf_counter_overflow(counter, 1, &data, regs))
                         sparc_pmu_disable_counter(hwc, idx);
         }