[PATCH] x86-64/i386: Revert cpuinfo siblings behaviour back to 2.6.10

Only display physical id/siblings when there are siblings or dual core.

In 2.6.11 I accidentially broke it and it was always displaying these
fields But for compatibility to all these /proc parsers around it is better
to do it in the old way again.  

Noticed by Suresh Siddha

Cc: <Suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
index e50fc41de6b9..a191d4831789 100644
--- a/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86_64/kernel/setup.c
@@ -1113,8 +1113,12 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
                 seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
         
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
-        seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[c - cpu_data]);
-        seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
+        if (smp_num_siblings * c->x86_num_cores > 1) {
+                int cpu = c - cpu_data;
+                seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[cpu]);
+                seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
+                                c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
+        }
 #endif  
 
         seq_printf(m,