x86: Remove STACKPROTECTOR_ALL

STACKPROTECTOR_ALL has a really high overhead (runtime and stack
footprint) and is not really worth it protection wise (the
normal STACKPROTECTOR is in effect for all functions with
buffers already), so lets just remove the option entirely.

Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091023073101.3dce4ebb@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2 files changed, 0 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
index 07e01149e3bf..72ace9515a07 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -1443,12 +1443,8 @@ config SECCOMP
 
           If unsure, say Y. Only embedded should say N here.
 
-config CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL
-        bool
-
 config CC_STACKPROTECTOR
         bool "Enable -fstack-protector buffer overflow detection (EXPERIMENTAL)"
-        select CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL
         ---help---
           This option turns on the -fstack-protector GCC feature. This
           feature puts, at the beginning of functions, a canary value on
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index a012ee8ef803..d2d24c9ee64d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -76,7 +76,6 @@ ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
         cc_has_sp := $(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_$(BITS)-has-stack-protector.sh
         ifeq ($(shell $(CONFIG_SHELL) $(cc_has_sp) $(CC) $(biarch)),y)
                 stackp-y := -fstack-protector
-                stackp-$(CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR_ALL) += -fstack-protector-all
                 KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(stackp-y)
         else
                 $(warning stack protector enabled but no compiler support)