x86: rename CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM to CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM

Linus observed:

> The real bug is that we shouldn't have "double negatives", and
> certainly not negative config options. Making that "promiscuous
> /dev/mem" option a negated thing as a config option was bad.

right ... lets rename this option. There should never be a negation
in config options.

[ that reminds me of CONFIG_SCHED_NO_NO_OMIT_FRAME_POINTER, but that
  is for another commit ;-) ]

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
index d4585077977a..c34dc483839c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat.c
@@ -373,8 +373,8 @@ pgprot_t phys_mem_access_prot(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
         return vma_prot;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM
-/* This check is done in drivers/char/mem.c in case of NONPROMISC_DEVMEM*/
+#ifndef CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM
+/* This check is done in drivers/char/mem.c in case of !PROMISC_DEVMEM*/
 static inline int range_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size)
 {
         return 1;
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ static inline int range_is_allowed(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long size)
         }
         return 1;
 }
-#endif /* CONFIG_NONPROMISC_DEVMEM */
+#endif /* CONFIG_PROMISC_DEVMEM */
 
 int phys_mem_access_prot_allowed(struct file *file, unsigned long pfn,
                                 unsigned long size, pgprot_t *vma_prot)