x86: more users of PF_ constants in fault_32|64.c

Should be the last of the error_code tests that could use
the PF_ defines.  Makes X86_32|64 a little closer.

Signed-off-by: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

1 files changed, 4 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
index b1893ebf6456..421e276770ad 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault_32.c
@@ -404,7 +404,8 @@ void __kprobes do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code)
          * protection error (error_code & 9) == 0.
          */
         if (unlikely(address >= TASK_SIZE)) {
-                if (!(error_code & 0x0000000d) && vmalloc_fault(address) >= 0)
+                if (!(error_code & (PF_RSVD|PF_USER|PF_PROT)) &&
+                    vmalloc_fault(address) >= 0)
                         return;
                 if (notify_page_fault(regs))
                         return;
@@ -603,7 +604,7 @@ no_context:
                 __typeof__(pte_val(__pte(0))) page;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_PAE
-                if (error_code & 16) {
+                if (error_code & PF_INSTR) {
                         pte_t *pte = lookup_address(address);
 
                         if (pte && pte_present(*pte) && !pte_exec_kernel(*pte))
@@ -674,7 +675,7 @@ out_of_memory:
                 goto survive;
         }
         printk("VM: killing process %s\n", tsk->comm);
-        if (error_code & 4)
+        if (error_code & PF_USER)
                 do_group_exit(SIGKILL);
         goto no_context;