x86: remove misleading comments in trampoline_*.S

Both trampolines actually *do* set up stack. (Is the "we jump into
compressed/head.S" comment still true?)

Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

2 files changed, 1 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_32.S
index 9bcc1c6aca3d..64580679861e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_32.S
@@ -11,12 +11,7 @@
  *      trampoline page to make our stack and everything else
  *      is a mystery.
  *
- *      In fact we don't actually need a stack so we don't
- *      set one up.
- *
- *      We jump into the boot/compressed/head.S code. So you'd
- *      better be running a compressed kernel image or you
- *      won't get very far.
+ *      We jump into arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S.
  *
  *      On entry to trampoline_data, the processor is in real mode
  *      with 16-bit addressing and 16-bit data.  CS has some value
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_64.S b/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_64.S
index e30b67c6a9f5..4aedd0bcee4c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/trampoline_64.S
@@ -10,9 +10,6 @@
  *      trampoline page to make our stack and everything else
  *      is a mystery.
  *
- *      In fact we don't actually need a stack so we don't
- *      set one up.
- *
  *      On entry to trampoline_data, the processor is in real mode
  *      with 16-bit addressing and 16-bit data.  CS has some value
  *      and IP is zero.  Thus, data addresses need to be absolute