x86: vsyscall: Use NULL instead 0 for a pointer argument

This patch silences the following sparse warning:
arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c:250:34:
       warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer

Signed-off-by: Emil Goode <emilgoode@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1333306084-3776-1-git-send-email-emilgoode@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

1 files changed, 3 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
index f386dc49f988..7515cf0e1805 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c
@@ -216,9 +216,9 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
         current_thread_info()->sig_on_uaccess_error = 1;
 
         /*
-         * 0 is a valid user pointer (in the access_ok sense) on 32-bit and
+         * NULL is a valid user pointer (in the access_ok sense) on 32-bit and
          * 64-bit, so we don't need to special-case it here.  For all the
-         * vsyscalls, 0 means "don't write anything" not "write it at
+         * vsyscalls, NULL means "don't write anything" not "write it at
          * address 0".
          */
         ret = -EFAULT;
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long address)
 
                 ret = sys_getcpu((unsigned __user *)regs->di,
                                  (unsigned __user *)regs->si,
-                                 0);
+                                 NULL);
                 break;
         }