x86: Fix MSI-X initialization by using online_mask for x2apic target_cpus

found a system where x2apic reports an MSI-X irq initialization
failure:

[  302.859446] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
[  302.874369] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: using 64bit DMA mask
[  302.879023] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: using 64bit consistent DMA mask
[  302.894386] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: enabling bus mastering
[  302.898171] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: setting latency timer to 64
[  302.914050] reserve_memtype added 0xefb08000-0xefb0c000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus
[  302.933839] reserve_memtype added 0xefb28000-0xefb29000, track uncached-minus, req uncached-minus, ret uncached-minus
[  302.940367]   alloc irq_desc for 265 on node 4
[  302.956874]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 4
[  302.959452] alloc irq_2_iommu on node 0
[  302.974328] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: irq 265 for MSI/MSI-X
[  302.977778]   alloc irq_desc for 266 on node 4
[  302.980347]   alloc kstat_irqs on node 4
[  302.995312] free_memtype request 0xefb28000-0xefb29000
[  302.998816] igbvf 0000:81:10.4: Failed to initialize MSI-X interrupts.

... it turns out that when trying to enable MSI-X,
__assign_irq_vector(new, cfg_new, apic->target_cpus()) can not
get vector because for x2apic target-cpus returns cpumask_of(0)

Update that to online_mask like xapic.

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
LKML-Reference: <4A785AFF.3050902@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

2 files changed, 10 insertions, 6 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
index 2ed4e2bb3b32..a5371ec36776 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_cluster.c
@@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ static int x2apic_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
         return x2apic_enabled();
 }
 
-/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU.  IRQ balancing will shift them. */
-
+/*
+ * need to use more than cpu 0, because we need more vectors when
+ * MSI-X are used.
+ */
 static const struct cpumask *x2apic_target_cpus(void)
 {
-        return cpumask_of(0);
+        return cpu_online_mask;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_phys.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_phys.c
index 0b631c6a2e00..a8989aadc99a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_phys.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_phys.c
@@ -27,11 +27,13 @@ static int x2apic_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *oem_id, char *oem_table_id)
                 return 0;
 }
 
-/* Start with all IRQs pointing to boot CPU.  IRQ balancing will shift them. */
-
+/*
+ * need to use more than cpu 0, because we need more vectors when
+ * MSI-X are used.
+ */
 static const struct cpumask *x2apic_target_cpus(void)
 {
-        return cpumask_of(0);
+        return cpu_online_mask;
 }
 
 static void x2apic_vector_allocation_domain(int cpu, struct cpumask *retmask)