x86, mm: Correct the implementation of is_untracked_pat_range()

The semantics the PAT code expect of is_untracked_pat_range() is "is
this range completely contained inside the untracked region."  This
means that checkin 8a27138924f64d2f30c1022f909f74480046bc3f was
technically wrong, because the implementation needlessly confusing.

The sane interface is for it to take a semiclosed range like just
about everything else (as evidenced by the sheer number of "- 1"'s
removed by that patch) so change the actual implementation to match.

Reported-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Jack Steiner <steiner@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091119202341.GA4420@sgi.com>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h
index 68b4e0ec1950..761249e396fe 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/e820.h
@@ -133,9 +133,13 @@ extern void e820_reserve_resources_late(void);
 extern void setup_memory_map(void);
 extern char *default_machine_specific_memory_setup(void);
 
+/*
+ * Returns true iff the specified range [s,e) is completely contained inside
+ * the ISA region.
+ */
 static inline bool is_ISA_range(u64 s, u64 e)
 {
-        return s >= ISA_START_ADDRESS && e < ISA_END_ADDRESS;
+        return s >= ISA_START_ADDRESS && e <= ISA_END_ADDRESS;
 }
 
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */