ppc64: remove ppc_irq_dispatch_handler

Use __do_IRQ instead.  The only difference is that every controller
is now assumed to have an end() routine (only xics_8259 did not).

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>

2 files changed, 4 insertions, 108 deletions

diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c b/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c
index b61497d5be28..bd6a95a5914d 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/irq.c
@@ -144,110 +144,6 @@ void fixup_irqs(cpumask_t map)
 }
 #endif
 
-extern int noirqdebug;
-
-/*
- * Eventually, this should take an array of interrupts and an array size
- * so it can dispatch multiple interrupts.
- */
-void ppc_irq_dispatch_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int irq)
-{
-        int status;
-        struct irqaction *action;
-        int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-        irq_desc_t *desc = get_irq_desc(irq);
-        irqreturn_t action_ret;
-
-        kstat_cpu(cpu).irqs[irq]++;
-
-        if (desc->status & IRQ_PER_CPU) {
-                /* no locking required for CPU-local interrupts: */
-                ack_irq(irq);
-                action_ret = handle_IRQ_event(irq, regs, desc->action);
-                desc->handler->end(irq);
-                return;
-        }
-
-        spin_lock(&desc->lock);
-        ack_irq(irq);   
-        /*
-           REPLAY is when Linux resends an IRQ that was dropped earlier
-           WAITING is used by probe to mark irqs that are being tested
-           */
-        status = desc->status & ~(IRQ_REPLAY | IRQ_WAITING);
-        status |= IRQ_PENDING; /* we _want_ to handle it */
-
-        /*
-         * If the IRQ is disabled for whatever reason, we cannot
-         * use the action we have.
-         */
-        action = NULL;
-        if (likely(!(status & (IRQ_DISABLED | IRQ_INPROGRESS)))) {
-                action = desc->action;
-                if (!action || !action->handler) {
-                        ppc_spurious_interrupts++;
-                        printk(KERN_DEBUG "Unhandled interrupt %x, disabled\n", irq);
-                        /* We can't call disable_irq here, it would deadlock */
-                        if (!desc->depth)
-                                desc->depth = 1;
-                        desc->status |= IRQ_DISABLED;
-                        /* This is not a real spurrious interrupt, we
-                         * have to eoi it, so we jump to out
-                         */
-                        mask_irq(irq);
-                        goto out;
-                }
-                status &= ~IRQ_PENDING; /* we commit to handling */
-                status |= IRQ_INPROGRESS; /* we are handling it */
-        }
-        desc->status = status;
-
-        /*
-         * If there is no IRQ handler or it was disabled, exit early.
-           Since we set PENDING, if another processor is handling
-           a different instance of this same irq, the other processor
-           will take care of it.
-         */
-        if (unlikely(!action))
-                goto out;
-
-        /*
-         * Edge triggered interrupts need to remember
-         * pending events.
-         * This applies to any hw interrupts that allow a second
-         * instance of the same irq to arrive while we are in do_IRQ
-         * or in the handler. But the code here only handles the _second_
-         * instance of the irq, not the third or fourth. So it is mostly
-         * useful for irq hardware that does not mask cleanly in an
-         * SMP environment.
-         */
-        for (;;) {
-                spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
-
-                action_ret = handle_IRQ_event(irq, regs, action);
-
-                spin_lock(&desc->lock);
-                if (!noirqdebug)
-                        note_interrupt(irq, desc, action_ret, regs);
-                if (likely(!(desc->status & IRQ_PENDING)))
-                        break;
-                desc->status &= ~IRQ_PENDING;
-        }
-out:
-        desc->status &= ~IRQ_INPROGRESS;
-        /*
-         * The ->end() handler has to deal with interrupts which got
-         * disabled while the handler was running.
-         */
-        if (desc->handler) {
-                if (desc->handler->end)
-                        desc->handler->end(irq);
-                else if (desc->handler->enable)
-                        desc->handler->enable(irq);
-        }
-        spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
-}
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES
 void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -325,13 +221,13 @@ void do_IRQ(struct pt_regs *regs)
                 if (curtp != irqtp) {
                         irqtp->task = curtp->task;
                         irqtp->flags = 0;
-                        call_ppc_irq_dispatch_handler(regs, irq, irqtp);
+                        call___do_IRQ(irq, regs, irqtp);
                         irqtp->task = NULL;
                         if (irqtp->flags)
                                 set_bits(irqtp->flags, &curtp->flags);
                 } else
 #endif
-                        ppc_irq_dispatch_handler(regs, irq);
+                        __do_IRQ(irq, regs);
         } else
                 /* That's not SMP safe ... but who cares ? */
                 ppc_spurious_interrupts++;
diff --git a/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S b/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S
index d82a30dc26f8..492bca6137eb 100644
--- a/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S
+++ b/arch/ppc64/kernel/misc.S
@@ -78,12 +78,12 @@ _GLOBAL(call_do_softirq)
         mtlr    r0
         blr
 
-_GLOBAL(call_ppc_irq_dispatch_handler)
+_GLOBAL(call___do_IRQ)
         mflr    r0
         std     r0,16(r1)
         stdu    r1,THREAD_SIZE-112(r5)
         mr      r1,r5
-        bl      .ppc_irq_dispatch_handler
+        bl      .__do_IRQ
         ld      r1,0(r1)
         ld      r0,16(r1)
         mtlr    r0