perf_counter: make it possible for hw_perf_counter_init to return error codes

Impact: better error reporting

At present, if hw_perf_counter_init encounters an error, all it can do
is return NULL, which causes sys_perf_counter_open to return an EINVAL
error to userspace.  This isn't very informative for userspace; it means
that userspace can't tell the difference between "sorry, oprofile is
already using the PMU" and "we don't support this CPU" and "this CPU
doesn't support the requested generic hardware event".

This commit uses the PTR_ERR/ERR_PTR/IS_ERR set of macros to let
hw_perf_counter_init return an error code on error rather than just NULL
if it wishes.  If it does so, that error code will be returned from
sys_perf_counter_open to userspace.  If it returns NULL, an EINVAL
error will be returned to userspace, as before.

This also adapts the powerpc hw_perf_counter_init to make use of this
to return ENXIO, EINVAL, EBUSY, or EOPNOTSUPP as appropriate.  It would
be good to add extra error numbers in future to allow userspace to
distinguish the various errors that are currently reported as EINVAL,
i.e. irq_period < 0, too many events in a group, conflict between
exclude_* settings in a group, and PMU resource conflict in a group.

[ v2: fix a bug pointed out by Corey Ashford where error returns from
      hw_perf_counter_init were not handled correctly in the case of
      raw hardware events.]

Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Orig-LKML-Reference: <20090330171023.682428180@chello.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 7 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
index 560dd1e7b524..0a4d14f279ae 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/perf_counter.c
@@ -624,13 +624,13 @@ hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
         int err;
 
         if (!ppmu)
-                return NULL;
+                return ERR_PTR(-ENXIO);
         if ((s64)counter->hw_event.irq_period < 0)
-                return NULL;
+                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
         if (!perf_event_raw(&counter->hw_event)) {
                 ev = perf_event_id(&counter->hw_event);
                 if (ev >= ppmu->n_generic || ppmu->generic_events[ev] == 0)
-                        return NULL;
+                        return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
                 ev = ppmu->generic_events[ev];
         } else {
                 ev = perf_event_config(&counter->hw_event);
@@ -656,14 +656,14 @@ hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
                 n = collect_events(counter->group_leader, ppmu->n_counter - 1,
                                    ctrs, events);
                 if (n < 0)
-                        return NULL;
+                        return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
         }
         events[n] = ev;
         ctrs[n] = counter;
         if (check_excludes(ctrs, n, 1))
-                return NULL;
+                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
         if (power_check_constraints(events, n + 1))
-                return NULL;
+                return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
 
         counter->hw.config = events[n];
         atomic64_set(&counter->hw.period_left, counter->hw_event.irq_period);
@@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ hw_perf_counter_init(struct perf_counter *counter)
         counter->destroy = hw_perf_counter_destroy;
 
         if (err)
-                return NULL;
+                return ERR_PTR(err);
         return &power_perf_ops;
 }