diff options
author | Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> | 2009-03-25 15:48:06 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> | 2009-03-30 17:14:44 -0400 |
commit | 99b76233803beab302123d243eea9e41149804f3 (patch) | |
tree | 398178210fe66845ccd6fa4258ba762a87e023ad /arch/powerpc/kernel | |
parent | 3dec7f59c370c7b58184d63293c3dc984d475840 (diff) |
proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy
as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL
->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting
in module refcount underflow.
We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops
and ->data.
But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment)
and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when
switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give
some thoughts.
->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for
protection.
rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm.
And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular.
We definitely don't want such modular code.
Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller.
So, let's nuke it.
Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c | 1 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c index 149cb112cd1a..13011a96a977 100644 --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas_flash.c | |||
@@ -669,7 +669,6 @@ static void remove_flash_pde(struct proc_dir_entry *dp) | |||
669 | { | 669 | { |
670 | if (dp) { | 670 | if (dp) { |
671 | kfree(dp->data); | 671 | kfree(dp->data); |
672 | dp->owner = NULL; | ||
673 | remove_proc_entry(dp->name, dp->parent); | 672 | remove_proc_entry(dp->name, dp->parent); |
674 | } | 673 | } |
675 | } | 674 | } |