[POWERPC] powerpc: Enable DEEPNAP power savings mode on 970MP

Without this patch, on an idle system I get:

cpu-power-0:21.638
cpu-power-1:27.102
cpu-power-2:29.343
cpu-power-3:25.784
Total: 103.8W

With this patch:

cpu-power-0:11.730
cpu-power-1:17.185
cpu-power-2:18.547
cpu-power-3:17.528
Total: 65.0W

If I lower HZ to 100, I can get it as low as:

cpu-power-0:10.938
cpu-power-1:16.021
cpu-power-2:17.245
cpu-power-3:16.145
Total: 60.2W

Another (older) Quad G5 went from 54W to 39W at HZ=250.

Coming back out of Deep Nap takes 40-70 cycles longer than coming back
from just Nap (which already takes quite a while). I don't think it'll
be a performance issue (interrupt latency on an idle system), but in
case someone does measurements feel free to report them.

Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Acked-by: Michael Buesch <mb@bu3sch.de>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
index 95382f994404..f02b402c66d9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ extern void __setup_cpu_745x(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC32 */
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
 extern void __setup_cpu_ppc970(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
+extern void __setup_cpu_ppc970MP(unsigned long offset, struct cpu_spec* spec);
 extern void __restore_cpu_ppc970(void);
 #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
 
@@ -221,7 +222,7 @@ struct cpu_spec	cpu_specs[] = {
                 .icache_bsize           = 128,
                 .dcache_bsize           = 128,
                 .num_pmcs               = 8,
-                .cpu_setup              = __setup_cpu_ppc970,
+                .cpu_setup              = __setup_cpu_ppc970MP,
                 .cpu_restore            = __restore_cpu_ppc970,
                 .oprofile_cpu_type      = "ppc64/970",
                 .oprofile_type          = PPC_OPROFILE_POWER4,