Generic semaphore implementation

Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, so a generic C
implementation is better for maintainability, debuggability and
extensibility.  Thanks to Peter Zijlstra for fixing the lockdep
warning.  Thanks to Harvey Harrison for pointing out that the
unlikely() was unnecessary.

Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 53 deletions

diff --git a/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S b/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
deleted file mode 100644
index 0215624c1602..000000000000
--- a/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-/*
- *  linux/arch/m68k/lib/semaphore.S
- *
- *  Copyright (C) 1996  Linus Torvalds
- *
- *  m68k version by Andreas Schwab
- */
-
-#include <linux/linkage.h>
-#include <asm/semaphore.h>
-
-/*
- * The semaphore operations have a special calling sequence that
- * allow us to do a simpler in-line version of them. These routines
- * need to convert that sequence back into the C sequence when
- * there is contention on the semaphore.
- */
-ENTRY(__down_failed)
-        moveml %a0/%d0/%d1,-(%sp)
-        movel %a1,-(%sp)
-        jbsr __down
-        movel (%sp)+,%a1
-        moveml (%sp)+,%a0/%d0/%d1
-        rts
-
-ENTRY(__down_failed_interruptible)
-        movel %a0,-(%sp)
-        movel %d1,-(%sp)
-        movel %a1,-(%sp)
-        jbsr __down_interruptible
-        movel (%sp)+,%a1
-        movel (%sp)+,%d1
-        movel (%sp)+,%a0
-        rts
-
-ENTRY(__down_failed_trylock)
-        movel %a0,-(%sp)
-        movel %d1,-(%sp)
-        movel %a1,-(%sp)
-        jbsr __down_trylock
-        movel (%sp)+,%a1
-        movel (%sp)+,%d1
-        movel (%sp)+,%a0
-        rts
-
-ENTRY(__up_wakeup)
-        moveml %a0/%d0/%d1,-(%sp)
-        movel %a1,-(%sp)
-        jbsr __up
-        movel (%sp)+,%a1
-        moveml (%sp)+,%a0/%d0/%d1
-        rts
-