[PATCH] x86-64/i386: Revert cpuinfo siblings behaviour back to 2.6.10

Only display physical id/siblings when there are siblings or dual core.

In 2.6.11 I accidentially broke it and it was always displaying these
fields But for compatibility to all these /proc parsers around it is better
to do it in the old way again.  

Noticed by Suresh Siddha

Cc: <Suresh.b.siddha@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
index c8d83fdc237a..89a2956ee657 100644
--- a/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -94,8 +94,11 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
         if (c->x86_cache_size >= 0)
                 seq_printf(m, "cache size\t: %d KB\n", c->x86_cache_size);
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_HT
-        seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
-        seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n", c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
+        if (c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings > 1) {
+                seq_printf(m, "physical id\t: %d\n", phys_proc_id[n]);
+                seq_printf(m, "siblings\t: %d\n",
+                                c->x86_num_cores * smp_num_siblings);
+        }
 #endif
         
         /* We use exception 16 if we have hardware math and we've either seen it or the CPU claims it is internal */