[ARM] 3748/3: Correct error check in vfp_raise_exceptions

Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz

The recent fix to hide VFP_NAN_FLAG broke the check in vfp_raise_exceptions;
it would attempt to deliver an exception mask of 0xfffffeff instead of reporting
a serious error condition using printk.  Define a safe constant to use for
an invalid exception maskm, and use it at both ends.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
index 9d265d5e748c..4178f6cc3d37 100644
--- a/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
+++ b/arch/arm/vfp/vfpmodule.c
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
 
         pr_debug("VFP: raising exceptions %08x\n", exceptions);
 
-        if (exceptions == (u32)-1) {
+        if (exceptions == VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR) {
                 vfp_panic("unhandled bounce");
                 vfp_raise_sigfpe(0, regs);
                 return;
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ static void vfp_raise_exceptions(u32 exceptions, u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_
  */
 static u32 vfp_emulate_instruction(u32 inst, u32 fpscr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
-        u32 exceptions = (u32)-1;
+        u32 exceptions = VFP_EXCEPTION_ERROR;
 
         pr_debug("VFP: emulate: INST=0x%08x SCR=0x%08x\n", inst, fpscr);