[ARM] 3294/1: don't invalidate individual BTB entries on ARMv6

Patch from Nicolas Pitre

Doing so adds a much larger cost to the loop than the cost implied by
simply invalidating the whole BTB at once.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 12 deletions

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v6.S b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v6.S
index 72966d90e956..d921c1024ae0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/cache-v6.S
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/cache-v6.S
@@ -92,22 +92,16 @@ ENTRY(v6_coherent_kern_range)
  *      - the Icache does not read data from the write buffer
  */
 ENTRY(v6_coherent_user_range)
-        bic     r0, r0, #CACHE_LINE_SIZE - 1
-1:
+
 #ifdef HARVARD_CACHE
-        mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 1          @ clean D line
+        bic     r0, r0, #CACHE_LINE_SIZE - 1
+1:      mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 1          @ clean D line
         mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c5, 1           @ invalidate I line
-#endif
-        mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c5, 7           @ invalidate BTB entry
-        add     r0, r0, #BTB_FLUSH_SIZE
-        mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c5, 7           @ invalidate BTB entry
-        add     r0, r0, #BTB_FLUSH_SIZE
-        mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c5, 7           @ invalidate BTB entry
-        add     r0, r0, #BTB_FLUSH_SIZE
-        mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c5, 7           @ invalidate BTB entry
-        add     r0, r0, #BTB_FLUSH_SIZE
+        add     r0, r0, #CACHE_LINE_SIZE
         cmp     r0, r1
         blo     1b
+#endif
+        mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c5, 6           @ invalidate BTB
 #ifdef HARVARD_CACHE
         mov     r0, #0
         mcr     p15, 0, r0, c7, c10, 4          @ drain write buffer