Merge branch 'i2c-for-linus' of git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6

* 'i2c-for-linus' of git://jdelvare.pck.nerim.net/jdelvare-2.6:
  i2c-core: Some style cleanups
  i2c-piix4: Add support for the Broadcom HT1100 chipset
  i2c-piix4: Add support to SB800 SMBus changes
  i2c-pca-platform: Use defaults if no platform_data given
  i2c-algo-pca: Use timeout for checking the state machine
  i2c-algo-pca: Rework waiting for a free bus
  i2c-algo-pca: Add PCA9665 support
  i2c: Adapt debug macros for KERN_* constants
  i2c-davinci: Fix timeout handling
  i2c: Adapter timeout is in jiffies
  i2c: Set a default timeout value for all adapters
  i2c: Add missing KERN_* constants to printks
  i2c-algo-pcf: Handle timeout correctly
  i2c-algo-pcf: Style cleanups
  eeprom/at24: Remove EXPERIMENTAL
  i2c-nforce2: Add support for MCP67, MCP73, MCP78S and MCP79
  i2c: Clarify which clients are auto-removed
  i2c: Let checkpatch shout on users of the legacy model
  i2c: Document the different ways to instantiate i2c devices

5 files changed, 193 insertions, 10 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 02ea3773535e..7907586c6e08 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@ -340,7 +340,8 @@ Who:  Krzysztof Piotr Oledzki <ole@ans.pl>
 ---------------------------
 
 What:   i2c_attach_client(), i2c_detach_client(), i2c_driver->detach_client()
-When:   2.6.29 (ideally) or 2.6.30 (more likely)
+When:   2.6.30
+Check:  i2c_attach_client i2c_detach_client
 Why:    Deprecated by the new (standard) device driver binding model. Use
         i2c_driver->probe() and ->remove() instead.
 Who:    Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2 b/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2
index fae3495bcbaf..9698c396b830 100644
--- a/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-nforce2
@@ -7,10 +7,14 @@ Supported adapters:
   * nForce3 250Gb MCP          10de:00E4 
   * nForce4 MCP                10de:0052
   * nForce4 MCP-04             10de:0034
-  * nForce4 MCP51              10de:0264
-  * nForce4 MCP55              10de:0368
-  * nForce4 MCP61              10de:03EB
-  * nForce4 MCP65              10de:0446
+  * nForce MCP51               10de:0264
+  * nForce MCP55               10de:0368
+  * nForce MCP61               10de:03EB
+  * nForce MCP65               10de:0446
+  * nForce MCP67               10de:0542
+  * nForce MCP73               10de:07D8
+  * nForce MCP78S              10de:0752
+  * nForce MCP79               10de:0AA2
 
 Datasheet: not publicly available, but seems to be similar to the
            AMD-8111 SMBus 2.0 adapter.
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4 b/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4
index ef1efa79b1df..f889481762b5 100644
--- a/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/busses/i2c-piix4
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Supported adapters:
   * Intel 82371AB PIIX4 and PIIX4E
   * Intel 82443MX (440MX)
     Datasheet: Publicly available at the Intel website
-  * ServerWorks OSB4, CSB5, CSB6 and HT-1000 southbridges
+  * ServerWorks OSB4, CSB5, CSB6, HT-1000 and HT-1100 southbridges
     Datasheet: Only available via NDA from ServerWorks
   * ATI IXP200, IXP300, IXP400, SB600, SB700 and SB800 southbridges
     Datasheet: Not publicly available
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices b/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..b55ce57a84db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/instantiating-devices
@@ -0,0 +1,167 @@
+How to instantiate I2C devices
+==============================
+
+Unlike PCI or USB devices, I2C devices are not enumerated at the hardware
+level. Instead, the software must know which devices are connected on each
+I2C bus segment, and what address these devices are using. For this
+reason, the kernel code must instantiate I2C devices explicitly. There are
+several ways to achieve this, depending on the context and requirements.
+
+
+Method 1: Declare the I2C devices by bus number
+-----------------------------------------------
+
+This method is appropriate when the I2C bus is a system bus as is the case
+for many embedded systems. On such systems, each I2C bus has a number
+which is known in advance. It is thus possible to pre-declare the I2C
+devices which live on this bus. This is done with an array of struct
+i2c_board_info which is registered by calling i2c_register_board_info().
+
+Example (from omap2 h4):
+
+static struct i2c_board_info __initdata h4_i2c_board_info[] = {
+        {
+                I2C_BOARD_INFO("isp1301_omap", 0x2d),
+                .irq            = OMAP_GPIO_IRQ(125),
+        },
+        {       /* EEPROM on mainboard */
+                I2C_BOARD_INFO("24c01", 0x52),
+                .platform_data  = &m24c01,
+        },
+        {       /* EEPROM on cpu card */
+                I2C_BOARD_INFO("24c01", 0x57),
+                .platform_data  = &m24c01,
+        },
+};
+
+static void __init omap_h4_init(void)
+{
+        (...)
+        i2c_register_board_info(1, h4_i2c_board_info,
+                        ARRAY_SIZE(h4_i2c_board_info));
+        (...)
+}
+
+The above code declares 3 devices on I2C bus 1, including their respective
+addresses and custom data needed by their drivers. When the I2C bus in
+question is registered, the I2C devices will be instantiated automatically
+by i2c-core.
+
+The devices will be automatically unbound and destroyed when the I2C bus
+they sit on goes away (if ever.)
+
+
+Method 2: Instantiate the devices explicitly
+--------------------------------------------
+
+This method is appropriate when a larger device uses an I2C bus for
+internal communication. A typical case is TV adapters. These can have a
+tuner, a video decoder, an audio decoder, etc. usually connected to the
+main chip by the means of an I2C bus. You won't know the number of the I2C
+bus in advance, so the method 1 described above can't be used. Instead,
+you can instantiate your I2C devices explicitly. This is done by filling
+a struct i2c_board_info and calling i2c_new_device().
+
+Example (from the sfe4001 network driver):
+
+static struct i2c_board_info sfe4001_hwmon_info = {
+        I2C_BOARD_INFO("max6647", 0x4e),
+};
+
+int sfe4001_init(struct efx_nic *efx)
+{
+        (...)
+        efx->board_info.hwmon_client =
+                i2c_new_device(&efx->i2c_adap, &sfe4001_hwmon_info);
+
+        (...)
+}
+
+The above code instantiates 1 I2C device on the I2C bus which is on the
+network adapter in question.
+
+A variant of this is when you don't know for sure if an I2C device is
+present or not (for example for an optional feature which is not present
+on cheap variants of a board but you have no way to tell them apart), or
+it may have different addresses from one board to the next (manufacturer
+changing its design without notice). In this case, you can call
+i2c_new_probed_device() instead of i2c_new_device().
+
+Example (from the pnx4008 OHCI driver):
+
+static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = { 0x2c, 0x2d, I2C_CLIENT_END };
+
+static int __devinit usb_hcd_pnx4008_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+        (...)
+        struct i2c_adapter *i2c_adap;
+        struct i2c_board_info i2c_info;
+
+        (...)
+        i2c_adap = i2c_get_adapter(2);
+        memset(&i2c_info, 0, sizeof(struct i2c_board_info));
+        strlcpy(i2c_info.name, "isp1301_pnx", I2C_NAME_SIZE);
+        isp1301_i2c_client = i2c_new_probed_device(i2c_adap, &i2c_info,
+                                                   normal_i2c);
+        i2c_put_adapter(i2c_adap);
+        (...)
+}
+
+The above code instantiates up to 1 I2C device on the I2C bus which is on
+the OHCI adapter in question. It first tries at address 0x2c, if nothing
+is found there it tries address 0x2d, and if still nothing is found, it
+simply gives up.
+
+The driver which instantiated the I2C device is responsible for destroying
+it on cleanup. This is done by calling i2c_unregister_device() on the
+pointer that was earlier returned by i2c_new_device() or
+i2c_new_probed_device().
+
+
+Method 3: Probe an I2C bus for certain devices
+----------------------------------------------
+
+Sometimes you do not have enough information about an I2C device, not even
+to call i2c_new_probed_device(). The typical case is hardware monitoring
+chips on PC mainboards. There are several dozen models, which can live
+at 25 different addresses. Given the huge number of mainboards out there,
+it is next to impossible to build an exhaustive list of the hardware
+monitoring chips being used. Fortunately, most of these chips have
+manufacturer and device ID registers, so they can be identified by
+probing.
+
+In that case, I2C devices are neither declared nor instantiated
+explicitly. Instead, i2c-core will probe for such devices as soon as their
+drivers are loaded, and if any is found, an I2C device will be
+instantiated automatically. In order to prevent any misbehavior of this
+mechanism, the following restrictions apply:
+* The I2C device driver must implement the detect() method, which
+  identifies a supported device by reading from arbitrary registers.
+* Only buses which are likely to have a supported device and agree to be
+  probed, will be probed. For example this avoids probing for hardware
+  monitoring chips on a TV adapter.
+
+Example:
+See lm90_driver and lm90_detect() in drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
+
+I2C devices instantiated as a result of such a successful probe will be
+destroyed automatically when the driver which detected them is removed,
+or when the underlying I2C bus is itself destroyed, whichever happens
+first.
+
+Those of you familiar with the i2c subsystem of 2.4 kernels and early 2.6
+kernels will find out that this method 3 is essentially similar to what
+was done there. Two significant differences are:
+* Probing is only one way to instantiate I2C devices now, while it was the
+  only way back then. Where possible, methods 1 and 2 should be preferred.
+  Method 3 should only be used when there is no other way, as it can have
+  undesirable side effects.
+* I2C buses must now explicitly say which I2C driver classes can probe
+  them (by the means of the class bitfield), while all I2C buses were
+  probed by default back then. The default is an empty class which means
+  that no probing happens. The purpose of the class bitfield is to limit
+  the aforementioned undesirable side effects.
+
+Once again, method 3 should be avoided wherever possible. Explicit device
+instantiation (methods 1 and 2) is much preferred for it is safer and
+faster.
diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients b/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients
index 6b9af7d479c2..c1a06f989cf7 100644
--- a/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients
+++ b/Documentation/i2c/writing-clients
@@ -207,15 +207,26 @@ You simply have to define a detect callback which will attempt to
 identify supported devices (returning 0 for supported ones and -ENODEV
 for unsupported ones), a list of addresses to probe, and a device type
 (or class) so that only I2C buses which may have that type of device
-connected (and not otherwise enumerated) will be probed.  The i2c
-core will then call you back as needed and will instantiate a device
-for you for every successful detection.
+connected (and not otherwise enumerated) will be probed.  For example,
+a driver for a hardware monitoring chip for which auto-detection is
+needed would set its class to I2C_CLASS_HWMON, and only I2C adapters
+with a class including I2C_CLASS_HWMON would be probed by this driver.
+Note that the absence of matching classes does not prevent the use of
+a device of that type on the given I2C adapter.  All it prevents is
+auto-detection; explicit instantiation of devices is still possible.
 
 Note that this mechanism is purely optional and not suitable for all
 devices.  You need some reliable way to identify the supported devices
 (typically using device-specific, dedicated identification registers),
 otherwise misdetections are likely to occur and things can get wrong
-quickly.
+quickly.  Keep in mind that the I2C protocol doesn't include any
+standard way to detect the presence of a chip at a given address, let
+alone a standard way to identify devices.  Even worse is the lack of
+semantics associated to bus transfers, which means that the same
+transfer can be seen as a read operation by a chip and as a write
+operation by another chip.  For these reasons, explicit device
+instantiation should always be preferred to auto-detection where
+possible.
 
 
 Device Deletion