diff options
author | Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> | 2012-11-02 04:05:42 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com> | 2012-12-10 23:43:39 -0500 |
commit | 98e4da8ca301e062d79ae168c67e56f3c3de3ce4 (patch) | |
tree | 5bcbd6fc641b8f15e0af5642f94c55aca941035e /Documentation | |
parent | 29594404d7fe73cd80eaa4ee8c43dcc53970c60e (diff) |
f2fs: add document
This adds a document describing the mount options, proc entries, usage, and
design of Flash-Friendly File System, namely F2FS.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt | 417 |
2 files changed, 419 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX index 8c624a18f67d..ce5fd4677919 100644 --- a/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/00-INDEX | |||
@@ -48,6 +48,8 @@ ext4.txt | |||
48 | - info, mount options and specifications for the Ext4 filesystem. | 48 | - info, mount options and specifications for the Ext4 filesystem. |
49 | files.txt | 49 | files.txt |
50 | - info on file management in the Linux kernel. | 50 | - info on file management in the Linux kernel. |
51 | f2fs.txt | ||
52 | - info and mount options for the F2FS filesystem. | ||
51 | fuse.txt | 53 | fuse.txt |
52 | - info on the Filesystem in User SpacE including mount options. | 54 | - info on the Filesystem in User SpacE including mount options. |
53 | gfs2.txt | 55 | gfs2.txt |
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..6ce540717dc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/f2fs.txt | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,417 @@ | |||
1 | ================================================================================ | ||
2 | WHAT IS Flash-Friendly File System (F2FS)? | ||
3 | ================================================================================ | ||
4 | |||
5 | NAND flash memory-based storage devices, such as SSD, eMMC, and SD cards, have | ||
6 | been equipped on a variety systems ranging from mobile to server systems. Since | ||
7 | they are known to have different characteristics from the conventional rotating | ||
8 | disks, a file system, an upper layer to the storage device, should adapt to the | ||
9 | changes from the sketch in the design level. | ||
10 | |||
11 | F2FS is a file system exploiting NAND flash memory-based storage devices, which | ||
12 | is based on Log-structured File System (LFS). The design has been focused on | ||
13 | addressing the fundamental issues in LFS, which are snowball effect of wandering | ||
14 | tree and high cleaning overhead. | ||
15 | |||
16 | Since a NAND flash memory-based storage device shows different characteristic | ||
17 | according to its internal geometry or flash memory management scheme, namely FTL, | ||
18 | F2FS and its tools support various parameters not only for configuring on-disk | ||
19 | layout, but also for selecting allocation and cleaning algorithms. | ||
20 | |||
21 | The file system formatting tool, "mkfs.f2fs", is available from the following | ||
22 | download page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/f2fs-tools/ | ||
23 | |||
24 | ================================================================================ | ||
25 | BACKGROUND AND DESIGN ISSUES | ||
26 | ================================================================================ | ||
27 | |||
28 | Log-structured File System (LFS) | ||
29 | -------------------------------- | ||
30 | "A log-structured file system writes all modifications to disk sequentially in | ||
31 | a log-like structure, thereby speeding up both file writing and crash recovery. | ||
32 | The log is the only structure on disk; it contains indexing information so that | ||
33 | files can be read back from the log efficiently. In order to maintain large free | ||
34 | areas on disk for fast writing, we divide the log into segments and use a | ||
35 | segment cleaner to compress the live information from heavily fragmented | ||
36 | segments." from Rosenblum, M. and Ousterhout, J. K., 1992, "The design and | ||
37 | implementation of a log-structured file system", ACM Trans. Computer Systems | ||
38 | 10, 1, 26–52. | ||
39 | |||
40 | Wandering Tree Problem | ||
41 | ---------------------- | ||
42 | In LFS, when a file data is updated and written to the end of log, its direct | ||
43 | pointer block is updated due to the changed location. Then the indirect pointer | ||
44 | block is also updated due to the direct pointer block update. In this manner, | ||
45 | the upper index structures such as inode, inode map, and checkpoint block are | ||
46 | also updated recursively. This problem is called as wandering tree problem [1], | ||
47 | and in order to enhance the performance, it should eliminate or relax the update | ||
48 | propagation as much as possible. | ||
49 | |||
50 | [1] Bityutskiy, A. 2005. JFFS3 design issues. http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/ | ||
51 | |||
52 | Cleaning Overhead | ||
53 | ----------------- | ||
54 | Since LFS is based on out-of-place writes, it produces so many obsolete blocks | ||
55 | scattered across the whole storage. In order to serve new empty log space, it | ||
56 | needs to reclaim these obsolete blocks seamlessly to users. This job is called | ||
57 | as a cleaning process. | ||
58 | |||
59 | The process consists of three operations as follows. | ||
60 | 1. A victim segment is selected through referencing segment usage table. | ||
61 | 2. It loads parent index structures of all the data in the victim identified by | ||
62 | segment summary blocks. | ||
63 | 3. It checks the cross-reference between the data and its parent index structure. | ||
64 | 4. It moves valid data selectively. | ||
65 | |||
66 | This cleaning job may cause unexpected long delays, so the most important goal | ||
67 | is to hide the latencies to users. And also definitely, it should reduce the | ||
68 | amount of valid data to be moved, and move them quickly as well. | ||
69 | |||
70 | ================================================================================ | ||
71 | KEY FEATURES | ||
72 | ================================================================================ | ||
73 | |||
74 | Flash Awareness | ||
75 | --------------- | ||
76 | - Enlarge the random write area for better performance, but provide the high | ||
77 | spatial locality | ||
78 | - Align FS data structures to the operational units in FTL as best efforts | ||
79 | |||
80 | Wandering Tree Problem | ||
81 | ---------------------- | ||
82 | - Use a term, “node”, that represents inodes as well as various pointer blocks | ||
83 | - Introduce Node Address Table (NAT) containing the locations of all the “node” | ||
84 | blocks; this will cut off the update propagation. | ||
85 | |||
86 | Cleaning Overhead | ||
87 | ----------------- | ||
88 | - Support a background cleaning process | ||
89 | - Support greedy and cost-benefit algorithms for victim selection policies | ||
90 | - Support multi-head logs for static/dynamic hot and cold data separation | ||
91 | - Introduce adaptive logging for efficient block allocation | ||
92 | |||
93 | ================================================================================ | ||
94 | MOUNT OPTIONS | ||
95 | ================================================================================ | ||
96 | |||
97 | background_gc_off Turn off cleaning operations, namely garbage collection, | ||
98 | triggered in background when I/O subsystem is idle. | ||
99 | disable_roll_forward Disable the roll-forward recovery routine | ||
100 | discard Issue discard/TRIM commands when a segment is cleaned. | ||
101 | no_heap Disable heap-style segment allocation which finds free | ||
102 | segments for data from the beginning of main area, while | ||
103 | for node from the end of main area. | ||
104 | nouser_xattr Disable Extended User Attributes. Note: xattr is enabled | ||
105 | by default if CONFIG_F2FS_FS_XATTR is selected. | ||
106 | noacl Disable POSIX Access Control List. Note: acl is enabled | ||
107 | by default if CONFIG_F2FS_FS_POSIX_ACL is selected. | ||
108 | active_logs=%u Support configuring the number of active logs. In the | ||
109 | current design, f2fs supports only 2, 4, and 6 logs. | ||
110 | Default number is 6. | ||
111 | disable_ext_identify Disable the extension list configured by mkfs, so f2fs | ||
112 | does not aware of cold files such as media files. | ||
113 | |||
114 | ================================================================================ | ||
115 | DEBUGFS ENTRIES | ||
116 | ================================================================================ | ||
117 | |||
118 | /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/ contains information about all the partitions mounted as | ||
119 | f2fs. Each file shows the whole f2fs information. | ||
120 | |||
121 | /sys/kernel/debug/f2fs/status includes: | ||
122 | - major file system information managed by f2fs currently | ||
123 | - average SIT information about whole segments | ||
124 | - current memory footprint consumed by f2fs. | ||
125 | |||
126 | ================================================================================ | ||
127 | USAGE | ||
128 | ================================================================================ | ||
129 | |||
130 | 1. Download userland tools and compile them. | ||
131 | |||
132 | 2. Skip, if f2fs was compiled statically inside kernel. | ||
133 | Otherwise, insert the f2fs.ko module. | ||
134 | # insmod f2fs.ko | ||
135 | |||
136 | 3. Create a directory trying to mount | ||
137 | # mkdir /mnt/f2fs | ||
138 | |||
139 | 4. Format the block device, and then mount as f2fs | ||
140 | # mkfs.f2fs -l label /dev/block_device | ||
141 | # mount -t f2fs /dev/block_device /mnt/f2fs | ||
142 | |||
143 | Format options | ||
144 | -------------- | ||
145 | -l [label] : Give a volume label, up to 256 unicode name. | ||
146 | -a [0 or 1] : Split start location of each area for heap-based allocation. | ||
147 | 1 is set by default, which performs this. | ||
148 | -o [int] : Set overprovision ratio in percent over volume size. | ||
149 | 5 is set by default. | ||
150 | -s [int] : Set the number of segments per section. | ||
151 | 1 is set by default. | ||
152 | -z [int] : Set the number of sections per zone. | ||
153 | 1 is set by default. | ||
154 | -e [str] : Set basic extension list. e.g. "mp3,gif,mov" | ||
155 | |||
156 | ================================================================================ | ||
157 | DESIGN | ||
158 | ================================================================================ | ||
159 | |||
160 | On-disk Layout | ||
161 | -------------- | ||
162 | |||
163 | F2FS divides the whole volume into a number of segments, each of which is fixed | ||
164 | to 2MB in size. A section is composed of consecutive segments, and a zone | ||
165 | consists of a set of sections. By default, section and zone sizes are set to one | ||
166 | segment size identically, but users can easily modify the sizes by mkfs. | ||
167 | |||
168 | F2FS splits the entire volume into six areas, and all the areas except superblock | ||
169 | consists of multiple segments as described below. | ||
170 | |||
171 | align with the zone size <-| | ||
172 | |-> align with the segment size | ||
173 | _________________________________________________________________________ | ||
174 | | | | Node | Segment | Segment | | | ||
175 | | Superblock | Checkpoint | Address | Info. | Summary | Main | | ||
176 | | (SB) | (CP) | Table (NAT) | Table (SIT) | Area (SSA) | | | ||
177 | |____________|_____2______|______N______|______N______|______N_____|__N___| | ||
178 | . . | ||
179 | . . | ||
180 | . . | ||
181 | ._________________________________________. | ||
182 | |_Segment_|_..._|_Segment_|_..._|_Segment_| | ||
183 | . . | ||
184 | ._________._________ | ||
185 | |_section_|__...__|_ | ||
186 | . . | ||
187 | .________. | ||
188 | |__zone__| | ||
189 | |||
190 | - Superblock (SB) | ||
191 | : It is located at the beginning of the partition, and there exist two copies | ||
192 | to avoid file system crash. It contains basic partition information and some | ||
193 | default parameters of f2fs. | ||
194 | |||
195 | - Checkpoint (CP) | ||
196 | : It contains file system information, bitmaps for valid NAT/SIT sets, orphan | ||
197 | inode lists, and summary entries of current active segments. | ||
198 | |||
199 | - Node Address Table (NAT) | ||
200 | : It is composed of a block address table for all the node blocks stored in | ||
201 | Main area. | ||
202 | |||
203 | - Segment Information Table (SIT) | ||
204 | : It contains segment information such as valid block count and bitmap for the | ||
205 | validity of all the blocks. | ||
206 | |||
207 | - Segment Summary Area (SSA) | ||
208 | : It contains summary entries which contains the owner information of all the | ||
209 | data and node blocks stored in Main area. | ||
210 | |||
211 | - Main Area | ||
212 | : It contains file and directory data including their indices. | ||
213 | |||
214 | In order to avoid misalignment between file system and flash-based storage, F2FS | ||
215 | aligns the start block address of CP with the segment size. Also, it aligns the | ||
216 | start block address of Main area with the zone size by reserving some segments | ||
217 | in SSA area. | ||
218 | |||
219 | Reference the following survey for additional technical details. | ||
220 | https://wiki.linaro.org/WorkingGroups/Kernel/Projects/FlashCardSurvey | ||
221 | |||
222 | File System Metadata Structure | ||
223 | ------------------------------ | ||
224 | |||
225 | F2FS adopts the checkpointing scheme to maintain file system consistency. At | ||
226 | mount time, F2FS first tries to find the last valid checkpoint data by scanning | ||
227 | CP area. In order to reduce the scanning time, F2FS uses only two copies of CP. | ||
228 | One of them always indicates the last valid data, which is called as shadow copy | ||
229 | mechanism. In addition to CP, NAT and SIT also adopt the shadow copy mechanism. | ||
230 | |||
231 | For file system consistency, each CP points to which NAT and SIT copies are | ||
232 | valid, as shown as below. | ||
233 | |||
234 | +--------+----------+---------+ | ||
235 | | CP | NAT | SIT | | ||
236 | +--------+----------+---------+ | ||
237 | . . . . | ||
238 | . . . . | ||
239 | . . . . | ||
240 | +-------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | ||
241 | | CP #0 | CP #1 | NAT #0 | NAT #1 | SIT #0 | SIT #1 | | ||
242 | +-------+-------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | ||
243 | | ^ ^ | ||
244 | | | | | ||
245 | `----------------------------------------' | ||
246 | |||
247 | Index Structure | ||
248 | --------------- | ||
249 | |||
250 | The key data structure to manage the data locations is a "node". Similar to | ||
251 | traditional file structures, F2FS has three types of node: inode, direct node, | ||
252 | indirect node. F2FS assigns 4KB to an inode block which contains 929 data block | ||
253 | indices, two direct node pointers, two indirect node pointers, and one double | ||
254 | indirect node pointer as described below. One direct node block contains 1018 | ||
255 | data blocks, and one indirect node block contains also 1018 node blocks. Thus, | ||
256 | one inode block (i.e., a file) covers: | ||
257 | |||
258 | 4KB * (923 + 2 * 1018 + 2 * 1018 * 1018 + 1018 * 1018 * 1018) := 3.94TB. | ||
259 | |||
260 | Inode block (4KB) | ||
261 | |- data (923) | ||
262 | |- direct node (2) | ||
263 | | `- data (1018) | ||
264 | |- indirect node (2) | ||
265 | | `- direct node (1018) | ||
266 | | `- data (1018) | ||
267 | `- double indirect node (1) | ||
268 | `- indirect node (1018) | ||
269 | `- direct node (1018) | ||
270 | `- data (1018) | ||
271 | |||
272 | Note that, all the node blocks are mapped by NAT which means the location of | ||
273 | each node is translated by the NAT table. In the consideration of the wandering | ||
274 | tree problem, F2FS is able to cut off the propagation of node updates caused by | ||
275 | leaf data writes. | ||
276 | |||
277 | Directory Structure | ||
278 | ------------------- | ||
279 | |||
280 | A directory entry occupies 11 bytes, which consists of the following attributes. | ||
281 | |||
282 | - hash hash value of the file name | ||
283 | - ino inode number | ||
284 | - len the length of file name | ||
285 | - type file type such as directory, symlink, etc | ||
286 | |||
287 | A dentry block consists of 214 dentry slots and file names. Therein a bitmap is | ||
288 | used to represent whether each dentry is valid or not. A dentry block occupies | ||
289 | 4KB with the following composition. | ||
290 | |||
291 | Dentry Block(4 K) = bitmap (27 bytes) + reserved (3 bytes) + | ||
292 | dentries(11 * 214 bytes) + file name (8 * 214 bytes) | ||
293 | |||
294 | [Bucket] | ||
295 | +--------------------------------+ | ||
296 | |dentry block 1 | dentry block 2 | | ||
297 | +--------------------------------+ | ||
298 | . . | ||
299 | . . | ||
300 | . [Dentry Block Structure: 4KB] . | ||
301 | +--------+----------+----------+------------+ | ||
302 | | bitmap | reserved | dentries | file names | | ||
303 | +--------+----------+----------+------------+ | ||
304 | [Dentry Block: 4KB] . . | ||
305 | . . | ||
306 | . . | ||
307 | +------+------+-----+------+ | ||
308 | | hash | ino | len | type | | ||
309 | +------+------+-----+------+ | ||
310 | [Dentry Structure: 11 bytes] | ||
311 | |||
312 | F2FS implements multi-level hash tables for directory structure. Each level has | ||
313 | a hash table with dedicated number of hash buckets as shown below. Note that | ||
314 | "A(2B)" means a bucket includes 2 data blocks. | ||
315 | |||
316 | ---------------------- | ||
317 | A : bucket | ||
318 | B : block | ||
319 | N : MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH | ||
320 | ---------------------- | ||
321 | |||
322 | level #0 | A(2B) | ||
323 | | | ||
324 | level #1 | A(2B) - A(2B) | ||
325 | | | ||
326 | level #2 | A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) | ||
327 | . | . . . . | ||
328 | level #N/2 | A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - A(2B) - ... - A(2B) | ||
329 | . | . . . . | ||
330 | level #N | A(4B) - A(4B) - A(4B) - A(4B) - A(4B) - ... - A(4B) | ||
331 | |||
332 | The number of blocks and buckets are determined by, | ||
333 | |||
334 | ,- 2, if n < MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH / 2, | ||
335 | # of blocks in level #n = | | ||
336 | `- 4, Otherwise | ||
337 | |||
338 | ,- 2^n, if n < MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH / 2, | ||
339 | # of buckets in level #n = | | ||
340 | `- 2^((MAX_DIR_HASH_DEPTH / 2) - 1), Otherwise | ||
341 | |||
342 | When F2FS finds a file name in a directory, at first a hash value of the file | ||
343 | name is calculated. Then, F2FS scans the hash table in level #0 to find the | ||
344 | dentry consisting of the file name and its inode number. If not found, F2FS | ||
345 | scans the next hash table in level #1. In this way, F2FS scans hash tables in | ||
346 | each levels incrementally from 1 to N. In each levels F2FS needs to scan only | ||
347 | one bucket determined by the following equation, which shows O(log(# of files)) | ||
348 | complexity. | ||
349 | |||
350 | bucket number to scan in level #n = (hash value) % (# of buckets in level #n) | ||
351 | |||
352 | In the case of file creation, F2FS finds empty consecutive slots that cover the | ||
353 | file name. F2FS searches the empty slots in the hash tables of whole levels from | ||
354 | 1 to N in the same way as the lookup operation. | ||
355 | |||
356 | The following figure shows an example of two cases holding children. | ||
357 | --------------> Dir <-------------- | ||
358 | | | | ||
359 | child child | ||
360 | |||
361 | child - child [hole] - child | ||
362 | |||
363 | child - child - child [hole] - [hole] - child | ||
364 | |||
365 | Case 1: Case 2: | ||
366 | Number of children = 6, Number of children = 3, | ||
367 | File size = 7 File size = 7 | ||
368 | |||
369 | Default Block Allocation | ||
370 | ------------------------ | ||
371 | |||
372 | At runtime, F2FS manages six active logs inside "Main" area: Hot/Warm/Cold node | ||
373 | and Hot/Warm/Cold data. | ||
374 | |||
375 | - Hot node contains direct node blocks of directories. | ||
376 | - Warm node contains direct node blocks except hot node blocks. | ||
377 | - Cold node contains indirect node blocks | ||
378 | - Hot data contains dentry blocks | ||
379 | - Warm data contains data blocks except hot and cold data blocks | ||
380 | - Cold data contains multimedia data or migrated data blocks | ||
381 | |||
382 | LFS has two schemes for free space management: threaded log and copy-and-compac- | ||
383 | tion. The copy-and-compaction scheme which is known as cleaning, is well-suited | ||
384 | for devices showing very good sequential write performance, since free segments | ||
385 | are served all the time for writing new data. However, it suffers from cleaning | ||
386 | overhead under high utilization. Contrarily, the threaded log scheme suffers | ||
387 | from random writes, but no cleaning process is needed. F2FS adopts a hybrid | ||
388 | scheme where the copy-and-compaction scheme is adopted by default, but the | ||
389 | policy is dynamically changed to the threaded log scheme according to the file | ||
390 | system status. | ||
391 | |||
392 | In order to align F2FS with underlying flash-based storage, F2FS allocates a | ||
393 | segment in a unit of section. F2FS expects that the section size would be the | ||
394 | same as the unit size of garbage collection in FTL. Furthermore, with respect | ||
395 | to the mapping granularity in FTL, F2FS allocates each section of the active | ||
396 | logs from different zones as much as possible, since FTL can write the data in | ||
397 | the active logs into one allocation unit according to its mapping granularity. | ||
398 | |||
399 | Cleaning process | ||
400 | ---------------- | ||
401 | |||
402 | F2FS does cleaning both on demand and in the background. On-demand cleaning is | ||
403 | triggered when there are not enough free segments to serve VFS calls. Background | ||
404 | cleaner is operated by a kernel thread, and triggers the cleaning job when the | ||
405 | system is idle. | ||
406 | |||
407 | F2FS supports two victim selection policies: greedy and cost-benefit algorithms. | ||
408 | In the greedy algorithm, F2FS selects a victim segment having the smallest number | ||
409 | of valid blocks. In the cost-benefit algorithm, F2FS selects a victim segment | ||
410 | according to the segment age and the number of valid blocks in order to address | ||
411 | log block thrashing problem in the greedy algorithm. F2FS adopts the greedy | ||
412 | algorithm for on-demand cleaner, while background cleaner adopts cost-benefit | ||
413 | algorithm. | ||
414 | |||
415 | In order to identify whether the data in the victim segment are valid or not, | ||
416 | F2FS manages a bitmap. Each bit represents the validity of a block, and the | ||
417 | bitmap is composed of a bit stream covering whole blocks in main area. | ||