diff options
author | Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de> | 2007-11-16 19:09:28 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2008-01-28 17:54:14 -0500 |
commit | f7ab97f78a5c573e49474edbd260ea6898ddccda (patch) | |
tree | 4d23cf1ac6e8519ffae51cb887701c7521bbd87f /Documentation/networking | |
parent | beca222d1aa09c0b2f56a6af788eacf5c19093da (diff) |
[CAN]: Add documentation
This patch adds documentation for the PF_CAN protocol family.
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver.hartkopp@volkswagen.de>
Signed-off-by: Urs Thuermann <urs.thuermann@volkswagen.de>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/networking')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/networking/00-INDEX | 2 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/networking/can.txt | 629 |
2 files changed, 631 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/00-INDEX b/Documentation/networking/00-INDEX index 563e442f2d42..b4eefadb9adf 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/00-INDEX +++ b/Documentation/networking/00-INDEX | |||
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ baycom.txt | |||
24 | - info on the driver for Baycom style amateur radio modems | 24 | - info on the driver for Baycom style amateur radio modems |
25 | bridge.txt | 25 | bridge.txt |
26 | - where to get user space programs for ethernet bridging with Linux. | 26 | - where to get user space programs for ethernet bridging with Linux. |
27 | can.txt | ||
28 | - documentation on CAN protocol family. | ||
27 | cops.txt | 29 | cops.txt |
28 | - info on the COPS LocalTalk Linux driver | 30 | - info on the COPS LocalTalk Linux driver |
29 | cs89x0.txt | 31 | cs89x0.txt |
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/can.txt b/Documentation/networking/can.txt new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..f1b2de170929 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/networking/can.txt | |||
@@ -0,0 +1,629 @@ | |||
1 | ============================================================================ | ||
2 | |||
3 | can.txt | ||
4 | |||
5 | Readme file for the Controller Area Network Protocol Family (aka Socket CAN) | ||
6 | |||
7 | This file contains | ||
8 | |||
9 | 1 Overview / What is Socket CAN | ||
10 | |||
11 | 2 Motivation / Why using the socket API | ||
12 | |||
13 | 3 Socket CAN concept | ||
14 | 3.1 receive lists | ||
15 | 3.2 local loopback of sent frames | ||
16 | 3.3 network security issues (capabilities) | ||
17 | 3.4 network problem notifications | ||
18 | |||
19 | 4 How to use Socket CAN | ||
20 | 4.1 RAW protocol sockets with can_filters (SOCK_RAW) | ||
21 | 4.1.1 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_FILTER | ||
22 | 4.1.2 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER | ||
23 | 4.1.3 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK | ||
24 | 4.1.4 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS | ||
25 | 4.2 Broadcast Manager protocol sockets (SOCK_DGRAM) | ||
26 | 4.3 connected transport protocols (SOCK_SEQPACKET) | ||
27 | 4.4 unconnected transport protocols (SOCK_DGRAM) | ||
28 | |||
29 | 5 Socket CAN core module | ||
30 | 5.1 can.ko module params | ||
31 | 5.2 procfs content | ||
32 | 5.3 writing own CAN protocol modules | ||
33 | |||
34 | 6 CAN network drivers | ||
35 | 6.1 general settings | ||
36 | 6.2 local loopback of sent frames | ||
37 | 6.3 CAN controller hardware filters | ||
38 | 6.4 currently supported CAN hardware | ||
39 | 6.5 todo | ||
40 | |||
41 | 7 Credits | ||
42 | |||
43 | ============================================================================ | ||
44 | |||
45 | 1. Overview / What is Socket CAN | ||
46 | -------------------------------- | ||
47 | |||
48 | The socketcan package is an implementation of CAN protocols | ||
49 | (Controller Area Network) for Linux. CAN is a networking technology | ||
50 | which has widespread use in automation, embedded devices, and | ||
51 | automotive fields. While there have been other CAN implementations | ||
52 | for Linux based on character devices, Socket CAN uses the Berkeley | ||
53 | socket API, the Linux network stack and implements the CAN device | ||
54 | drivers as network interfaces. The CAN socket API has been designed | ||
55 | as similar as possible to the TCP/IP protocols to allow programmers, | ||
56 | familiar with network programming, to easily learn how to use CAN | ||
57 | sockets. | ||
58 | |||
59 | 2. Motivation / Why using the socket API | ||
60 | ---------------------------------------- | ||
61 | |||
62 | There have been CAN implementations for Linux before Socket CAN so the | ||
63 | question arises, why we have started another project. Most existing | ||
64 | implementations come as a device driver for some CAN hardware, they | ||
65 | are based on character devices and provide comparatively little | ||
66 | functionality. Usually, there is only a hardware-specific device | ||
67 | driver which provides a character device interface to send and | ||
68 | receive raw CAN frames, directly to/from the controller hardware. | ||
69 | Queueing of frames and higher-level transport protocols like ISO-TP | ||
70 | have to be implemented in user space applications. Also, most | ||
71 | character-device implementations support only one single process to | ||
72 | open the device at a time, similar to a serial interface. Exchanging | ||
73 | the CAN controller requires employment of another device driver and | ||
74 | often the need for adaption of large parts of the application to the | ||
75 | new driver's API. | ||
76 | |||
77 | Socket CAN was designed to overcome all of these limitations. A new | ||
78 | protocol family has been implemented which provides a socket interface | ||
79 | to user space applications and which builds upon the Linux network | ||
80 | layer, so to use all of the provided queueing functionality. A device | ||
81 | driver for CAN controller hardware registers itself with the Linux | ||
82 | network layer as a network device, so that CAN frames from the | ||
83 | controller can be passed up to the network layer and on to the CAN | ||
84 | protocol family module and also vice-versa. Also, the protocol family | ||
85 | module provides an API for transport protocol modules to register, so | ||
86 | that any number of transport protocols can be loaded or unloaded | ||
87 | dynamically. In fact, the can core module alone does not provide any | ||
88 | protocol and cannot be used without loading at least one additional | ||
89 | protocol module. Multiple sockets can be opened at the same time, | ||
90 | on different or the same protocol module and they can listen/send | ||
91 | frames on different or the same CAN IDs. Several sockets listening on | ||
92 | the same interface for frames with the same CAN ID are all passed the | ||
93 | same received matching CAN frames. An application wishing to | ||
94 | communicate using a specific transport protocol, e.g. ISO-TP, just | ||
95 | selects that protocol when opening the socket, and then can read and | ||
96 | write application data byte streams, without having to deal with | ||
97 | CAN-IDs, frames, etc. | ||
98 | |||
99 | Similar functionality visible from user-space could be provided by a | ||
100 | character device, too, but this would lead to a technically inelegant | ||
101 | solution for a couple of reasons: | ||
102 | |||
103 | * Intricate usage. Instead of passing a protocol argument to | ||
104 | socket(2) and using bind(2) to select a CAN interface and CAN ID, an | ||
105 | application would have to do all these operations using ioctl(2)s. | ||
106 | |||
107 | * Code duplication. A character device cannot make use of the Linux | ||
108 | network queueing code, so all that code would have to be duplicated | ||
109 | for CAN networking. | ||
110 | |||
111 | * Abstraction. In most existing character-device implementations, the | ||
112 | hardware-specific device driver for a CAN controller directly | ||
113 | provides the character device for the application to work with. | ||
114 | This is at least very unusual in Unix systems for both, char and | ||
115 | block devices. For example you don't have a character device for a | ||
116 | certain UART of a serial interface, a certain sound chip in your | ||
117 | computer, a SCSI or IDE controller providing access to your hard | ||
118 | disk or tape streamer device. Instead, you have abstraction layers | ||
119 | which provide a unified character or block device interface to the | ||
120 | application on the one hand, and a interface for hardware-specific | ||
121 | device drivers on the other hand. These abstractions are provided | ||
122 | by subsystems like the tty layer, the audio subsystem or the SCSI | ||
123 | and IDE subsystems for the devices mentioned above. | ||
124 | |||
125 | The easiest way to implement a CAN device driver is as a character | ||
126 | device without such a (complete) abstraction layer, as is done by most | ||
127 | existing drivers. The right way, however, would be to add such a | ||
128 | layer with all the functionality like registering for certain CAN | ||
129 | IDs, supporting several open file descriptors and (de)multiplexing | ||
130 | CAN frames between them, (sophisticated) queueing of CAN frames, and | ||
131 | providing an API for device drivers to register with. However, then | ||
132 | it would be no more difficult, or may be even easier, to use the | ||
133 | networking framework provided by the Linux kernel, and this is what | ||
134 | Socket CAN does. | ||
135 | |||
136 | The use of the networking framework of the Linux kernel is just the | ||
137 | natural and most appropriate way to implement CAN for Linux. | ||
138 | |||
139 | 3. Socket CAN concept | ||
140 | --------------------- | ||
141 | |||
142 | As described in chapter 2 it is the main goal of Socket CAN to | ||
143 | provide a socket interface to user space applications which builds | ||
144 | upon the Linux network layer. In contrast to the commonly known | ||
145 | TCP/IP and ethernet networking, the CAN bus is a broadcast-only(!) | ||
146 | medium that has no MAC-layer addressing like ethernet. The CAN-identifier | ||
147 | (can_id) is used for arbitration on the CAN-bus. Therefore the CAN-IDs | ||
148 | have to be chosen uniquely on the bus. When designing a CAN-ECU | ||
149 | network the CAN-IDs are mapped to be sent by a specific ECU. | ||
150 | For this reason a CAN-ID can be treated best as a kind of source address. | ||
151 | |||
152 | 3.1 receive lists | ||
153 | |||
154 | The network transparent access of multiple applications leads to the | ||
155 | problem that different applications may be interested in the same | ||
156 | CAN-IDs from the same CAN network interface. The Socket CAN core | ||
157 | module - which implements the protocol family CAN - provides several | ||
158 | high efficient receive lists for this reason. If e.g. a user space | ||
159 | application opens a CAN RAW socket, the raw protocol module itself | ||
160 | requests the (range of) CAN-IDs from the Socket CAN core that are | ||
161 | requested by the user. The subscription and unsubscription of | ||
162 | CAN-IDs can be done for specific CAN interfaces or for all(!) known | ||
163 | CAN interfaces with the can_rx_(un)register() functions provided to | ||
164 | CAN protocol modules by the SocketCAN core (see chapter 5). | ||
165 | To optimize the CPU usage at runtime the receive lists are split up | ||
166 | into several specific lists per device that match the requested | ||
167 | filter complexity for a given use-case. | ||
168 | |||
169 | 3.2 local loopback of sent frames | ||
170 | |||
171 | As known from other networking concepts the data exchanging | ||
172 | applications may run on the same or different nodes without any | ||
173 | change (except for the according addressing information): | ||
174 | |||
175 | ___ ___ ___ _______ ___ | ||
176 | | _ | | _ | | _ | | _ _ | | _ | | ||
177 | ||A|| ||B|| ||C|| ||A| |B|| ||C|| | ||
178 | |___| |___| |___| |_______| |___| | ||
179 | | | | | | | ||
180 | -----------------(1)- CAN bus -(2)--------------- | ||
181 | |||
182 | To ensure that application A receives the same information in the | ||
183 | example (2) as it would receive in example (1) there is need for | ||
184 | some kind of local loopback of the sent CAN frames on the appropriate | ||
185 | node. | ||
186 | |||
187 | The Linux network devices (by default) just can handle the | ||
188 | transmission and reception of media dependent frames. Due to the | ||
189 | arbritration on the CAN bus the transmission of a low prio CAN-ID | ||
190 | may be delayed by the reception of a high prio CAN frame. To | ||
191 | reflect the correct* traffic on the node the loopback of the sent | ||
192 | data has to be performed right after a successful transmission. If | ||
193 | the CAN network interface is not capable of performing the loopback for | ||
194 | some reason the SocketCAN core can do this task as a fallback solution. | ||
195 | See chapter 6.2 for details (recommended). | ||
196 | |||
197 | The loopback functionality is enabled by default to reflect standard | ||
198 | networking behaviour for CAN applications. Due to some requests from | ||
199 | the RT-SocketCAN group the loopback optionally may be disabled for each | ||
200 | separate socket. See sockopts from the CAN RAW sockets in chapter 4.1. | ||
201 | |||
202 | * = you really like to have this when you're running analyser tools | ||
203 | like 'candump' or 'cansniffer' on the (same) node. | ||
204 | |||
205 | 3.3 network security issues (capabilities) | ||
206 | |||
207 | The Controller Area Network is a local field bus transmitting only | ||
208 | broadcast messages without any routing and security concepts. | ||
209 | In the majority of cases the user application has to deal with | ||
210 | raw CAN frames. Therefore it might be reasonable NOT to restrict | ||
211 | the CAN access only to the user root, as known from other networks. | ||
212 | Since the currently implemented CAN_RAW and CAN_BCM sockets can only | ||
213 | send and receive frames to/from CAN interfaces it does not affect | ||
214 | security of others networks to allow all users to access the CAN. | ||
215 | To enable non-root users to access CAN_RAW and CAN_BCM protocol | ||
216 | sockets the Kconfig options CAN_RAW_USER and/or CAN_BCM_USER may be | ||
217 | selected at kernel compile time. | ||
218 | |||
219 | 3.4 network problem notifications | ||
220 | |||
221 | The use of the CAN bus may lead to several problems on the physical | ||
222 | and media access control layer. Detecting and logging of these lower | ||
223 | layer problems is a vital requirement for CAN users to identify | ||
224 | hardware issues on the physical transceiver layer as well as | ||
225 | arbitration problems and error frames caused by the different | ||
226 | ECUs. The occurrence of detected errors are important for diagnosis | ||
227 | and have to be logged together with the exact timestamp. For this | ||
228 | reason the CAN interface driver can generate so called Error Frames | ||
229 | that can optionally be passed to the user application in the same | ||
230 | way as other CAN frames. Whenever an error on the physical layer | ||
231 | or the MAC layer is detected (e.g. by the CAN controller) the driver | ||
232 | creates an appropriate error frame. Error frames can be requested by | ||
233 | the user application using the common CAN filter mechanisms. Inside | ||
234 | this filter definition the (interested) type of errors may be | ||
235 | selected. The reception of error frames is disabled by default. | ||
236 | |||
237 | 4. How to use Socket CAN | ||
238 | ------------------------ | ||
239 | |||
240 | Like TCP/IP, you first need to open a socket for communicating over a | ||
241 | CAN network. Since Socket CAN implements a new protocol family, you | ||
242 | need to pass PF_CAN as the first argument to the socket(2) system | ||
243 | call. Currently, there are two CAN protocols to choose from, the raw | ||
244 | socket protocol and the broadcast manager (BCM). So to open a socket, | ||
245 | you would write | ||
246 | |||
247 | s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW); | ||
248 | |||
249 | and | ||
250 | |||
251 | s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_DGRAM, CAN_BCM); | ||
252 | |||
253 | respectively. After the successful creation of the socket, you would | ||
254 | normally use the bind(2) system call to bind the socket to a CAN | ||
255 | interface (which is different from TCP/IP due to different addressing | ||
256 | - see chapter 3). After binding (CAN_RAW) or connecting (CAN_BCM) | ||
257 | the socket, you can read(2) and write(2) from/to the socket or use | ||
258 | send(2), sendto(2), sendmsg(2) and the recv* counterpart operations | ||
259 | on the socket as usual. There are also CAN specific socket options | ||
260 | described below. | ||
261 | |||
262 | The basic CAN frame structure and the sockaddr structure are defined | ||
263 | in include/linux/can.h: | ||
264 | |||
265 | struct can_frame { | ||
266 | canid_t can_id; /* 32 bit CAN_ID + EFF/RTR/ERR flags */ | ||
267 | __u8 can_dlc; /* data length code: 0 .. 8 */ | ||
268 | __u8 data[8] __attribute__((aligned(8))); | ||
269 | }; | ||
270 | |||
271 | The alignment of the (linear) payload data[] to a 64bit boundary | ||
272 | allows the user to define own structs and unions to easily access the | ||
273 | CAN payload. There is no given byteorder on the CAN bus by | ||
274 | default. A read(2) system call on a CAN_RAW socket transfers a | ||
275 | struct can_frame to the user space. | ||
276 | |||
277 | The sockaddr_can structure has an interface index like the | ||
278 | PF_PACKET socket, that also binds to a specific interface: | ||
279 | |||
280 | struct sockaddr_can { | ||
281 | sa_family_t can_family; | ||
282 | int can_ifindex; | ||
283 | union { | ||
284 | struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } tp16; | ||
285 | struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } tp20; | ||
286 | struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } mcnet; | ||
287 | struct { canid_t rx_id, tx_id; } isotp; | ||
288 | } can_addr; | ||
289 | }; | ||
290 | |||
291 | To determine the interface index an appropriate ioctl() has to | ||
292 | be used (example for CAN_RAW sockets without error checking): | ||
293 | |||
294 | int s; | ||
295 | struct sockaddr_can addr; | ||
296 | struct ifreq ifr; | ||
297 | |||
298 | s = socket(PF_CAN, SOCK_RAW, CAN_RAW); | ||
299 | |||
300 | strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "can0" ); | ||
301 | ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr); | ||
302 | |||
303 | addr.can_family = AF_CAN; | ||
304 | addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex; | ||
305 | |||
306 | bind(s, (struct sockaddr *)&addr, sizeof(addr)); | ||
307 | |||
308 | (..) | ||
309 | |||
310 | To bind a socket to all(!) CAN interfaces the interface index must | ||
311 | be 0 (zero). In this case the socket receives CAN frames from every | ||
312 | enabled CAN interface. To determine the originating CAN interface | ||
313 | the system call recvfrom(2) may be used instead of read(2). To send | ||
314 | on a socket that is bound to 'any' interface sendto(2) is needed to | ||
315 | specify the outgoing interface. | ||
316 | |||
317 | Reading CAN frames from a bound CAN_RAW socket (see above) consists | ||
318 | of reading a struct can_frame: | ||
319 | |||
320 | struct can_frame frame; | ||
321 | |||
322 | nbytes = read(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame)); | ||
323 | |||
324 | if (nbytes < 0) { | ||
325 | perror("can raw socket read"); | ||
326 | return 1; | ||
327 | } | ||
328 | |||
329 | /* paraniod check ... */ | ||
330 | if (nbytes < sizeof(struct can_frame)) { | ||
331 | fprintf(stderr, "read: incomplete CAN frame\n"); | ||
332 | return 1; | ||
333 | } | ||
334 | |||
335 | /* do something with the received CAN frame */ | ||
336 | |||
337 | Writing CAN frames can be done similarly, with the write(2) system call: | ||
338 | |||
339 | nbytes = write(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame)); | ||
340 | |||
341 | When the CAN interface is bound to 'any' existing CAN interface | ||
342 | (addr.can_ifindex = 0) it is recommended to use recvfrom(2) if the | ||
343 | information about the originating CAN interface is needed: | ||
344 | |||
345 | struct sockaddr_can addr; | ||
346 | struct ifreq ifr; | ||
347 | socklen_t len = sizeof(addr); | ||
348 | struct can_frame frame; | ||
349 | |||
350 | nbytes = recvfrom(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame), | ||
351 | 0, (struct sockaddr*)&addr, &len); | ||
352 | |||
353 | /* get interface name of the received CAN frame */ | ||
354 | ifr.ifr_ifindex = addr.can_ifindex; | ||
355 | ioctl(s, SIOCGIFNAME, &ifr); | ||
356 | printf("Received a CAN frame from interface %s", ifr.ifr_name); | ||
357 | |||
358 | To write CAN frames on sockets bound to 'any' CAN interface the | ||
359 | outgoing interface has to be defined certainly. | ||
360 | |||
361 | strcpy(ifr.ifr_name, "can0"); | ||
362 | ioctl(s, SIOCGIFINDEX, &ifr); | ||
363 | addr.can_ifindex = ifr.ifr_ifindex; | ||
364 | addr.can_family = AF_CAN; | ||
365 | |||
366 | nbytes = sendto(s, &frame, sizeof(struct can_frame), | ||
367 | 0, (struct sockaddr*)&addr, sizeof(addr)); | ||
368 | |||
369 | 4.1 RAW protocol sockets with can_filters (SOCK_RAW) | ||
370 | |||
371 | Using CAN_RAW sockets is extensively comparable to the commonly | ||
372 | known access to CAN character devices. To meet the new possibilities | ||
373 | provided by the multi user SocketCAN approach, some reasonable | ||
374 | defaults are set at RAW socket binding time: | ||
375 | |||
376 | - The filters are set to exactly one filter receiving everything | ||
377 | - The socket only receives valid data frames (=> no error frames) | ||
378 | - The loopback of sent CAN frames is enabled (see chapter 3.2) | ||
379 | - The socket does not receive its own sent frames (in loopback mode) | ||
380 | |||
381 | These default settings may be changed before or after binding the socket. | ||
382 | To use the referenced definitions of the socket options for CAN_RAW | ||
383 | sockets, include <linux/can/raw.h>. | ||
384 | |||
385 | 4.1.1 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_FILTER | ||
386 | |||
387 | The reception of CAN frames using CAN_RAW sockets can be controlled | ||
388 | by defining 0 .. n filters with the CAN_RAW_FILTER socket option. | ||
389 | |||
390 | The CAN filter structure is defined in include/linux/can.h: | ||
391 | |||
392 | struct can_filter { | ||
393 | canid_t can_id; | ||
394 | canid_t can_mask; | ||
395 | }; | ||
396 | |||
397 | A filter matches, when | ||
398 | |||
399 | <received_can_id> & mask == can_id & mask | ||
400 | |||
401 | which is analogous to known CAN controllers hardware filter semantics. | ||
402 | The filter can be inverted in this semantic, when the CAN_INV_FILTER | ||
403 | bit is set in can_id element of the can_filter structure. In | ||
404 | contrast to CAN controller hardware filters the user may set 0 .. n | ||
405 | receive filters for each open socket separately: | ||
406 | |||
407 | struct can_filter rfilter[2]; | ||
408 | |||
409 | rfilter[0].can_id = 0x123; | ||
410 | rfilter[0].can_mask = CAN_SFF_MASK; | ||
411 | rfilter[1].can_id = 0x200; | ||
412 | rfilter[1].can_mask = 0x700; | ||
413 | |||
414 | setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, &rfilter, sizeof(rfilter)); | ||
415 | |||
416 | To disable the reception of CAN frames on the selected CAN_RAW socket: | ||
417 | |||
418 | setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_FILTER, NULL, 0); | ||
419 | |||
420 | To set the filters to zero filters is quite obsolete as not read | ||
421 | data causes the raw socket to discard the received CAN frames. But | ||
422 | having this 'send only' use-case we may remove the receive list in the | ||
423 | Kernel to save a little (really a very little!) CPU usage. | ||
424 | |||
425 | 4.1.2 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER | ||
426 | |||
427 | As described in chapter 3.4 the CAN interface driver can generate so | ||
428 | called Error Frames that can optionally be passed to the user | ||
429 | application in the same way as other CAN frames. The possible | ||
430 | errors are divided into different error classes that may be filtered | ||
431 | using the appropriate error mask. To register for every possible | ||
432 | error condition CAN_ERR_MASK can be used as value for the error mask. | ||
433 | The values for the error mask are defined in linux/can/error.h . | ||
434 | |||
435 | can_err_mask_t err_mask = ( CAN_ERR_TX_TIMEOUT | CAN_ERR_BUSOFF ); | ||
436 | |||
437 | setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_ERR_FILTER, | ||
438 | &err_mask, sizeof(err_mask)); | ||
439 | |||
440 | 4.1.3 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK | ||
441 | |||
442 | To meet multi user needs the local loopback is enabled by default | ||
443 | (see chapter 3.2 for details). But in some embedded use-cases | ||
444 | (e.g. when only one application uses the CAN bus) this loopback | ||
445 | functionality can be disabled (separately for each socket): | ||
446 | |||
447 | int loopback = 0; /* 0 = disabled, 1 = enabled (default) */ | ||
448 | |||
449 | setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_LOOPBACK, &loopback, sizeof(loopback)); | ||
450 | |||
451 | 4.1.4 RAW socket option CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS | ||
452 | |||
453 | When the local loopback is enabled, all the sent CAN frames are | ||
454 | looped back to the open CAN sockets that registered for the CAN | ||
455 | frames' CAN-ID on this given interface to meet the multi user | ||
456 | needs. The reception of the CAN frames on the same socket that was | ||
457 | sending the CAN frame is assumed to be unwanted and therefore | ||
458 | disabled by default. This default behaviour may be changed on | ||
459 | demand: | ||
460 | |||
461 | int recv_own_msgs = 1; /* 0 = disabled (default), 1 = enabled */ | ||
462 | |||
463 | setsockopt(s, SOL_CAN_RAW, CAN_RAW_RECV_OWN_MSGS, | ||
464 | &recv_own_msgs, sizeof(recv_own_msgs)); | ||
465 | |||
466 | 4.2 Broadcast Manager protocol sockets (SOCK_DGRAM) | ||
467 | 4.3 connected transport protocols (SOCK_SEQPACKET) | ||
468 | 4.4 unconnected transport protocols (SOCK_DGRAM) | ||
469 | |||
470 | |||
471 | 5. Socket CAN core module | ||
472 | ------------------------- | ||
473 | |||
474 | The Socket CAN core module implements the protocol family | ||
475 | PF_CAN. CAN protocol modules are loaded by the core module at | ||
476 | runtime. The core module provides an interface for CAN protocol | ||
477 | modules to subscribe needed CAN IDs (see chapter 3.1). | ||
478 | |||
479 | 5.1 can.ko module params | ||
480 | |||
481 | - stats_timer: To calculate the Socket CAN core statistics | ||
482 | (e.g. current/maximum frames per second) this 1 second timer is | ||
483 | invoked at can.ko module start time by default. This timer can be | ||
484 | disabled by using stattimer=0 on the module comandline. | ||
485 | |||
486 | - debug: (removed since SocketCAN SVN r546) | ||
487 | |||
488 | 5.2 procfs content | ||
489 | |||
490 | As described in chapter 3.1 the Socket CAN core uses several filter | ||
491 | lists to deliver received CAN frames to CAN protocol modules. These | ||
492 | receive lists, their filters and the count of filter matches can be | ||
493 | checked in the appropriate receive list. All entries contain the | ||
494 | device and a protocol module identifier: | ||
495 | |||
496 | foo@bar:~$ cat /proc/net/can/rcvlist_all | ||
497 | |||
498 | receive list 'rx_all': | ||
499 | (vcan3: no entry) | ||
500 | (vcan2: no entry) | ||
501 | (vcan1: no entry) | ||
502 | device can_id can_mask function userdata matches ident | ||
503 | vcan0 000 00000000 f88e6370 f6c6f400 0 raw | ||
504 | (any: no entry) | ||
505 | |||
506 | In this example an application requests any CAN traffic from vcan0. | ||
507 | |||
508 | rcvlist_all - list for unfiltered entries (no filter operations) | ||
509 | rcvlist_eff - list for single extended frame (EFF) entries | ||
510 | rcvlist_err - list for error frames masks | ||
511 | rcvlist_fil - list for mask/value filters | ||
512 | rcvlist_inv - list for mask/value filters (inverse semantic) | ||
513 | rcvlist_sff - list for single standard frame (SFF) entries | ||
514 | |||
515 | Additional procfs files in /proc/net/can | ||
516 | |||
517 | stats - Socket CAN core statistics (rx/tx frames, match ratios, ...) | ||
518 | reset_stats - manual statistic reset | ||
519 | version - prints the Socket CAN core version and the ABI version | ||
520 | |||
521 | 5.3 writing own CAN protocol modules | ||
522 | |||
523 | To implement a new protocol in the protocol family PF_CAN a new | ||
524 | protocol has to be defined in include/linux/can.h . | ||
525 | The prototypes and definitions to use the Socket CAN core can be | ||
526 | accessed by including include/linux/can/core.h . | ||
527 | In addition to functions that register the CAN protocol and the | ||
528 | CAN device notifier chain there are functions to subscribe CAN | ||
529 | frames received by CAN interfaces and to send CAN frames: | ||
530 | |||
531 | can_rx_register - subscribe CAN frames from a specific interface | ||
532 | can_rx_unregister - unsubscribe CAN frames from a specific interface | ||
533 | can_send - transmit a CAN frame (optional with local loopback) | ||
534 | |||
535 | For details see the kerneldoc documentation in net/can/af_can.c or | ||
536 | the source code of net/can/raw.c or net/can/bcm.c . | ||
537 | |||
538 | 6. CAN network drivers | ||
539 | ---------------------- | ||
540 | |||
541 | Writing a CAN network device driver is much easier than writing a | ||
542 | CAN character device driver. Similar to other known network device | ||
543 | drivers you mainly have to deal with: | ||
544 | |||
545 | - TX: Put the CAN frame from the socket buffer to the CAN controller. | ||
546 | - RX: Put the CAN frame from the CAN controller to the socket buffer. | ||
547 | |||
548 | See e.g. at Documentation/networking/netdevices.txt . The differences | ||
549 | for writing CAN network device driver are described below: | ||
550 | |||
551 | 6.1 general settings | ||
552 | |||
553 | dev->type = ARPHRD_CAN; /* the netdevice hardware type */ | ||
554 | dev->flags = IFF_NOARP; /* CAN has no arp */ | ||
555 | |||
556 | dev->mtu = sizeof(struct can_frame); | ||
557 | |||
558 | The struct can_frame is the payload of each socket buffer in the | ||
559 | protocol family PF_CAN. | ||
560 | |||
561 | 6.2 local loopback of sent frames | ||
562 | |||
563 | As described in chapter 3.2 the CAN network device driver should | ||
564 | support a local loopback functionality similar to the local echo | ||
565 | e.g. of tty devices. In this case the driver flag IFF_ECHO has to be | ||
566 | set to prevent the PF_CAN core from locally echoing sent frames | ||
567 | (aka loopback) as fallback solution: | ||
568 | |||
569 | dev->flags = (IFF_NOARP | IFF_ECHO); | ||
570 | |||
571 | 6.3 CAN controller hardware filters | ||
572 | |||
573 | To reduce the interrupt load on deep embedded systems some CAN | ||
574 | controllers support the filtering of CAN IDs or ranges of CAN IDs. | ||
575 | These hardware filter capabilities vary from controller to | ||
576 | controller and have to be identified as not feasible in a multi-user | ||
577 | networking approach. The use of the very controller specific | ||
578 | hardware filters could make sense in a very dedicated use-case, as a | ||
579 | filter on driver level would affect all users in the multi-user | ||
580 | system. The high efficient filter sets inside the PF_CAN core allow | ||
581 | to set different multiple filters for each socket separately. | ||
582 | Therefore the use of hardware filters goes to the category 'handmade | ||
583 | tuning on deep embedded systems'. The author is running a MPC603e | ||
584 | @133MHz with four SJA1000 CAN controllers from 2002 under heavy bus | ||
585 | load without any problems ... | ||
586 | |||
587 | 6.4 currently supported CAN hardware (September 2007) | ||
588 | |||
589 | On the project website http://developer.berlios.de/projects/socketcan | ||
590 | there are different drivers available: | ||
591 | |||
592 | vcan: Virtual CAN interface driver (if no real hardware is available) | ||
593 | sja1000: Philips SJA1000 CAN controller (recommended) | ||
594 | i82527: Intel i82527 CAN controller | ||
595 | mscan: Motorola/Freescale CAN controller (e.g. inside SOC MPC5200) | ||
596 | ccan: CCAN controller core (e.g. inside SOC h7202) | ||
597 | slcan: For a bunch of CAN adaptors that are attached via a | ||
598 | serial line ASCII protocol (for serial / USB adaptors) | ||
599 | |||
600 | Additionally the different CAN adaptors (ISA/PCI/PCMCIA/USB/Parport) | ||
601 | from PEAK Systemtechnik support the CAN netdevice driver model | ||
602 | since Linux driver v6.0: http://www.peak-system.com/linux/index.htm | ||
603 | |||
604 | Please check the Mailing Lists on the berlios OSS project website. | ||
605 | |||
606 | 6.5 todo (September 2007) | ||
607 | |||
608 | The configuration interface for CAN network drivers is still an open | ||
609 | issue that has not been finalized in the socketcan project. Also the | ||
610 | idea of having a library module (candev.ko) that holds functions | ||
611 | that are needed by all CAN netdevices is not ready to ship. | ||
612 | Your contribution is welcome. | ||
613 | |||
614 | 7. Credits | ||
615 | ---------- | ||
616 | |||
617 | Oliver Hartkopp (PF_CAN core, filters, drivers, bcm) | ||
618 | Urs Thuermann (PF_CAN core, kernel integration, socket interfaces, raw, vcan) | ||
619 | Jan Kizka (RT-SocketCAN core, Socket-API reconciliation) | ||
620 | Wolfgang Grandegger (RT-SocketCAN core & drivers, Raw Socket-API reviews) | ||
621 | Robert Schwebel (design reviews, PTXdist integration) | ||
622 | Marc Kleine-Budde (design reviews, Kernel 2.6 cleanups, drivers) | ||
623 | Benedikt Spranger (reviews) | ||
624 | Thomas Gleixner (LKML reviews, coding style, posting hints) | ||
625 | Andrey Volkov (kernel subtree structure, ioctls, mscan driver) | ||
626 | Matthias Brukner (first SJA1000 CAN netdevice implementation Q2/2003) | ||
627 | Klaus Hitschler (PEAK driver integration) | ||
628 | Uwe Koppe (CAN netdevices with PF_PACKET approach) | ||
629 | Michael Schulze (driver layer loopback requirement, RT CAN drivers review) | ||