diff options
author | Matt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> | 2006-11-29 22:58:40 -0500 |
---|---|---|
committer | Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> | 2006-11-29 22:58:40 -0500 |
commit | 4ae0edc21b152c126e4a8c94ad5391f8ea051b31 (patch) | |
tree | 4b2800a40527316f36a329cf20782293d081e80e /Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt | |
parent | fa00e7e152690adc17fdc318e64909d4aff1763e (diff) |
Fix typos in /Documentation : 'U-Z'
This patch fixes typos in various Documentation txts. The patch addresses some
+words starting with the letters 'U-Z'.
Looks like I made it through the alphabet...just in time to start over again
+too! Maybe I can fit more profound fixes into the next round...? Time will
+tell. :)
Signed-off-by: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt index c300f26a2772..fb6e49cd41f4 100644 --- a/Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt +++ b/Documentation/networking/NAPI_HOWTO.txt | |||
@@ -601,7 +601,7 @@ a) | |||
601 | 601 | ||
602 | 5) dev->close() and dev->suspend() issues | 602 | 5) dev->close() and dev->suspend() issues |
603 | ========================================== | 603 | ========================================== |
604 | The driver writter neednt worry about this. The top net layer takes | 604 | The driver writer needn't worry about this; the top net layer takes |
605 | care of it. | 605 | care of it. |
606 | 606 | ||
607 | 6) Adding new Stats to /proc | 607 | 6) Adding new Stats to /proc |
@@ -622,9 +622,9 @@ FC should be programmed to apply in the case when the system cant pull out | |||
622 | packets fast enough i.e send a pause only when you run out of rx buffers. | 622 | packets fast enough i.e send a pause only when you run out of rx buffers. |
623 | Note FC in itself is a good solution but we have found it to not be | 623 | Note FC in itself is a good solution but we have found it to not be |
624 | much of a commodity feature (both in NICs and switches) and hence falls | 624 | much of a commodity feature (both in NICs and switches) and hence falls |
625 | under the same category as using NIC based mitigation. Also experiments | 625 | under the same category as using NIC based mitigation. Also, experiments |
626 | indicate that its much harder to resolve the resource allocation | 626 | indicate that it's much harder to resolve the resource allocation |
627 | issue (aka lazy receiving that NAPI offers) and hence quantify its usefullness | 627 | issue (aka lazy receiving that NAPI offers) and hence quantify its usefulness |
628 | proved harder. In any case, FC works even better with NAPI but is not | 628 | proved harder. In any case, FC works even better with NAPI but is not |
629 | necessary. | 629 | necessary. |
630 | 630 | ||