aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/mtd
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMatt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com>2009-04-27 09:06:31 -0400
committerJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>2009-06-12 12:01:47 -0400
commit19f594600110377ec4037fdf7fb93a25ec516212 (patch)
treebf88707b65f0138b754d896300976e474098a50d /Documentation/mtd
parent19af5cdb7c79ff5ec96a99893ffb7f894f4a3dc1 (diff)
trivial: Miscellaneous documentation typo fixes
Fix various typos in documentation txts. Signed-off-by: Matt LaPlante <kernel1@cyberdogtech.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/mtd')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt12
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt b/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt
index bdf93b7f0f24..274821b35a7f 100644
--- a/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/mtd/nand_ecc.txt
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ byte 255: bit7 bit6 bit5 bit4 bit3 bit2 bit1 bit0 rp1 rp3 rp5 ... rp15
50 cp5 cp5 cp5 cp5 cp4 cp4 cp4 cp4 50 cp5 cp5 cp5 cp5 cp4 cp4 cp4 cp4
51 51
52This figure represents a sector of 256 bytes. 52This figure represents a sector of 256 bytes.
53cp is my abbreviaton for column parity, rp for row parity. 53cp is my abbreviation for column parity, rp for row parity.
54 54
55Let's start to explain column parity. 55Let's start to explain column parity.
56cp0 is the parity that belongs to all bit0, bit2, bit4, bit6. 56cp0 is the parity that belongs to all bit0, bit2, bit4, bit6.
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ Measuring this code again showed big gain. When executing the original
560linux code 1 million times, this took about 1 second on my system. 560linux code 1 million times, this took about 1 second on my system.
561(using time to measure the performance). After this iteration I was back 561(using time to measure the performance). After this iteration I was back
562to 0.075 sec. Actually I had to decide to start measuring over 10 562to 0.075 sec. Actually I had to decide to start measuring over 10
563million interations in order not to loose too much accuracy. This one 563million iterations in order not to lose too much accuracy. This one
564definitely seemed to be the jackpot! 564definitely seemed to be the jackpot!
565 565
566There is a little bit more room for improvement though. There are three 566There is a little bit more room for improvement though. There are three
@@ -571,8 +571,8 @@ loop; This eliminates 3 statements per loop. Of course after the loop we
571need to correct by adding: 571need to correct by adding:
572 rp4 ^= rp4_6; 572 rp4 ^= rp4_6;
573 rp6 ^= rp4_6 573 rp6 ^= rp4_6
574Furthermore there are 4 sequential assingments to rp8. This can be 574Furthermore there are 4 sequential assignments to rp8. This can be
575encoded slightly more efficient by saving tmppar before those 4 lines 575encoded slightly more efficiently by saving tmppar before those 4 lines
576and later do rp8 = rp8 ^ tmppar ^ notrp8; 576and later do rp8 = rp8 ^ tmppar ^ notrp8;
577(where notrp8 is the value of rp8 before those 4 lines). 577(where notrp8 is the value of rp8 before those 4 lines).
578Again a use of the commutative property of xor. 578Again a use of the commutative property of xor.
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ Not a big change, but every penny counts :-)
622Analysis 7 622Analysis 7
623========== 623==========
624 624
625Acutally this made things worse. Not very much, but I don't want to move 625Actually this made things worse. Not very much, but I don't want to move
626into the wrong direction. Maybe something to investigate later. Could 626into the wrong direction. Maybe something to investigate later. Could
627have to do with caching again. 627have to do with caching again.
628 628
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ Analysis 8
642This makes things worse. Let's stick with attempt 6 and continue from there. 642This makes things worse. Let's stick with attempt 6 and continue from there.
643Although it seems that the code within the loop cannot be optimised 643Although it seems that the code within the loop cannot be optimised
644further there is still room to optimize the generation of the ecc codes. 644further there is still room to optimize the generation of the ecc codes.
645We can simply calcualate the total parity. If this is 0 then rp4 = rp5 645We can simply calculate the total parity. If this is 0 then rp4 = rp5
646etc. If the parity is 1, then rp4 = !rp5; 646etc. If the parity is 1, then rp4 = !rp5;
647But if rp4 = rp5 we do not need rp5 etc. We can just write the even bits 647But if rp4 = rp5 we do not need rp5 etc. We can just write the even bits
648in the result byte and then do something like 648in the result byte and then do something like