fs: change d_delete semantics

Change d_delete from a dentry deletion notification to a dentry caching
advise, more like ->drop_inode. Require it to be constant and idempotent,
and not take d_lock. This is how all existing filesystems use the callback
anyway.

This makes fine grained dentry locking of dput and dentry lru scanning
much simpler.

Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/porting b/Documentation/filesystems/porting
index b12c89538680..9e71c9ad3108 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/porting
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/porting
@@ -318,3 +318,11 @@ if it's zero is not *and* *never* *had* *been* enough.  Final unlink() and iput(
 may happen while the inode is in the middle of ->write_inode(); e.g. if you blindly
 free the on-disk inode, you may end up doing that while ->write_inode() is writing
 to it.
+
+---
+[mandatory]
+
+        .d_delete() now only advises the dcache as to whether or not to cache
+unreferenced dentries, and is now only called when the dentry refcount goes to
+0. Even on 0 refcount transition, it must be able to tolerate being called 0,
+1, or more times (eg. constant, idempotent).